Then why on earth didn't the super mods say this rather than saying 'Because it's pointless posting'? :P
I can't tell you you're breaking the rules, so instead, I'll just say 'lol'.
Now, we have 2 AGMs and a GM online, who is going to act first. I'm going with Wispur.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, ok - I totally see why this rule is in place now, I totally though dirtybuddhist was being a moderator because he used the modwarn.
Just because not everyone is eloquent at explaining a rule or they go with their own interpretation of why the rule is in place rather than what the person who actually put it in place intended doesn't mean the rule itself is stupid. I think nvr has clearly demonstrated perfect clarity as to why the rule should stay in place and it's up to management to clarify that.
If this rule is only because of pointless posting, why not get rid of the 'leave moderating to moderators' rule and just giving a pointless posting mod warn thing for not taking part in the actual discussion? Makes more sense to me.
So are you saying that it was right for them to be told off for it? E.g. http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...23#post8165823 Keeping in mind that it happened in the Spam forum :P.
Why is this still here?
Still not sorted... So calum can warn me and @Kardan; within maybe 15 mins, Yet this has been here for over 24 hrs?