Would you like reputation to change?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sammeth.

Obviously no one would publicly directly or indirectly ask for rep in this forum as its against the rules, and no one would be silly enough to do it in the forum feedback forum where a lot of management look....coughhintsplutter

---

Ite Sam can Ihave some rep please. xD

It's ok, Jake +repped me for my fantastic contribution to the forum over the last few years (3 years in 1 days!!!!!!!!)

coughsplutter

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sammeth.

I think a change in the system is needed, but its just striking a balance to giving it a kick that it needs rather than just rendering it pointless thats proving difficult. I think its the post count which is making it especially difficult, as if we put it too low people with high post counts would end up with stupidly high rep power. It might be worth just reducing the other limits and keeping the post count one the same or not changing it too much.

---

Does it necessarily need to take post counts into account? Perhaps after a few hundred/thousand, you could just ignore the post count and have it focus on years of membership and rep points earned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leaahh.

oh aren't you cool ;l

---

lol what you gonna do take off 5 rep from him :S

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GommeInc

Does it necessarily need to take post counts into account? Perhaps after a few hundred/thousand, you could just ignore the post count and have it focus on years of membership and rep points earned.

---

With it being 4000 still I think it's low enough for it not to be a problem really, I personally agree that post count shouldn't really be an issue with reputation as some people with high post counts have been hated universally (what up Jamie) but as it is atm I think it's still fair and who knows might get people wanting to post again now that rep is actually worth something again

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NotTitch

changes are ok, still think post count should be lower though, 4k posts in hardly encouraging new members, i been here 3 years and ant even got tht.

---

Post more then.

The thing thats annoying me is the 10 reps per day thing. I wanna rep everyone who posts in a thread I posted (encouraging the forum to be active yknow) and im now a full page (40 posts) behind cos i can only rep 10 people a day "/

Any more and it would be a bit mental tbh, even 10 is quite a few like I could be giving out 260 rep a day and Chirs could do 380 if he had any friends, been nearly doubled so having more to give would probably be overkill

Spose the theory is those with massive rep powers deserve to give out loads of rep cos they've earnt it

Here's a thought... maybe, depending on what usergroup you're in (such as Bronze, Silver, Gold stars etc.), the more people you can rep per day, and the less people you have to spread for.

So...

Bronze;

• Spread rep 40 times
• Rep max 4 people per day

Silver;

• Spread rep 35 times
• Rep max 6 people per day

Gold;

• Spread rep 30 times
• Rep max 8 people per day

etc.

Maybe not those exact figures - but just a thought!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

lol what you gonna do take off 5 rep from him :S



With it being 4000 still I think it's low enough for it not to be a problem really, I personally agree that post count shouldn't really be an issue with reputation as some people with high post counts have been hated universally (what up Jamie) but as it is atm I think it's still fair and who knows might get people wanting to post again now that rep is actually worth something again

---

I like Jamie..

---
Bio I like those ideas tbh. Sounds good :)

KKK unite together and rep kgo.