This is great.
The Single Market isn't complete though. For a complete Single Market as say the United States is or Australia requires EU law to extend across all industries and sectors so that includes handing over control of the City of London to regulators in Brussels. It includes extending EU control over to the services sector which is Britain's golden egg industry. That would also include joining the Eurozone. That would also include a banking union, a single energy market, permanent (large) fiscal transfers within the union from wealthier countries to the poorer ones within that said currency union, Britain subjecting itself to a Central European Bank that comes with Euro membership, the creation of a single European Treasury and much more.
Now you can see why it won't be completed. And of course the elephant in all of this which is what the Five Presidents Report proposes for the Eurozone is the ultimate creation of a political union for it to all work: in other words the end of sovereign nation states and the being of a federal Europe.
Obviously Britain cannot and will not take part in all of this. The Eurozone on the other hand, if it is to survive and not dissolve, must. Therefore if this does progress it means Britain will be in a permanent voting minority in the European Union (which it already is anyway) as the Eurozone will have to start voting even more as a coherent bloc in order to survive and implement the legislation and treaties required. This is why I keep repeating that we will be out regardless within the next decade as the political facts (on top of the economic facts I have posted) are moving in that direction. It is only a matter of time so why not leave now on our own terms?
So as I always say, the choice is between a uncertain EU which could collapse or begin to federate or retaining our independence.
> I opt for national independence.

