Maybe rep and below in terms of prizes can be allowed. Another issue with it was the judging, people would give it to their friends or whatever, and someone will always argue favoritism. The impartial judging is hard to attain.
Printable View
Maybe rep and below in terms of prizes can be allowed. Another issue with it was the judging, people would give it to their friends or whatever, and someone will always argue favoritism. The impartial judging is hard to attain.
i agree with jake. as long as they were littles one, like micky said.
and you actually intend to give out the prize.
I've never gone with favoritism or gave the prize to someone on purpose, I always get them to PM me and the ones who got it right, i keep the PM, the wrongly answered PMs get deleted, then I number them down from 1 to whatever number of PMs I have then use a Bot on mIRC to choose the winner. (using the !die command with RuneScript).Quote:
Originally Posted by nvrspk4
It's a very fair way and i've had no complaints yet and i've done about 10+ different comps.
Not saying everyone will do it the same way as me, some might go for favoritism or their friends but i doubt many people will be like that.
I've always given out decent prizes.Quote:
Originally Posted by samsaBEAR
I agree the rule should be reviewed and changed.
Wow, the rule is almost as patheic as no typing in Foreign languages
I used to always do comps and JackHB threatened to perm me for it lol
Ye ai agree they should be allowed as they arent harming anybody and someone gains a cool prize at the end =)
the whole "signature of the week" competitions weren't created to get habbo furniture as a prize, your prize was recognition. I think that's a good enough prize, i can't stress enough how pathetic the rule's are getting on here. :|
I actually believe the rule is justified. Last thing any of the Moderators, Super Moderators or Administrators need is 500 PMs because someone forgets to close a competition - or is biased in giving out the prizes. It's like the 'not naming scammers' rule, you can never prove fully you intend to give the prize out, and will be impartial...