Depends on the scale. Usually large scale, it isn't fast enough. Take the 2004 tsunami and Hurricane Katrina as an example.
Printable View
Depends on the scale. Usually large scale, it isn't fast enough. Take the 2004 tsunami and Hurricane Katrina as an example.
Well we're only human, I think we do well enough for what we can do when it comes to aid.
No matter how much Aid we give out to people there will always be people somewhere in the world that are in poverty.
This is a sweeping generalised statement. To say the the American Govenrment dont care about their own citizens is a very subjective statement and a little unworthy of the FM.
It is all very well to have an opinion about things that have gone wrong in hindsight when we can all be experts. Something like the New Orleans disaster has got to be a logistical nightmare that hasnt really happened before in the USA and Im sure lessons have been learned. However the situation is so complicated and I am sure we do not have all the facts to hand and indeed media manipulation comes into it as well as they are always focussing on the worst possible cases and situations.
Using that example you could say that in even in this country you could say the government doesnt care with families in North Wales still not back in their homes after 12 months due to freak flooding. This has more to do with people not having insurance to cover their homes though, in some cases. People of the world have their own responsibilities as well. It is not always the fault of the government.
Corruption was the main problem with aid not getting through. Goverments in the past have given millions to countries where those in charge and those in authority have lined their pockets or diverted the money to buy arms and weapons.
Direct help seems to be more popular now with aid given as drugs for Malaria, aids and HIV but the G8 countries really should concentrate on having a unified strategy in making sure that the billions of aid yearly are spent wisely and to help the citizens of those countries be encouraged to help themselves. Ex President Clinton I know has brokered a deal with the major drug companies that make huge profits to supply affordable drugs to the third world particularly to help with HIV and Malaria. The worldwide aids statistics make very grim reading though and this is something only the citizens of those countries can do anything about.
Link:
http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm
Most of the 'civilised world' does help to fund poorer countries but it is not a never ending pot. The governments of those countries have to be more proactive and less tribal in helping and educating their citizens. As far as unseen disasters are concerned I am sure that everybody does their utmost to help in the circumtances and I am not sure you can really plan for an event like that.
Yes, but it doesn't matter if they weren't prepared. They new a cyclone was coming, they did not know how bad it was. But even so to take that long for a city evacuation & something to be done about it is not acceptable, doesn't matter about the circumstanced. We don't know all the facts but the government should of taken more action instead of them just telling the army "yeah go in and rescue people". They try and help the most but situations like that need more attention then other things that are happening at the time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_...on_New_Orleans
and exerpt from the above link:
Ninety percent (90%) of the residents of southeast Louisiana were evacuated in the most successful evacuation of a major urban area in the nation's history. Despite this, many remained (mainly the elderly and poor). The Louisiana Superdome was used as a designated "refuge of last resort" for those who remained in the city
It seems many remained at their own risk but the Mayor issued a mandatory warning on the day before for everybody to evacuate. The whole publicity issue though appears to have been focussed on the 20/25,000 who sought refuge in the Super Dome where conditions were said to be horrid and yes perhaps these people could have been looked after better although they were evacuated on the 31st May only 2 days after the storm. I am sure lessons will have been learned about this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CNN
Seems liky the did a good job didnt they. The whole rape issues with the teenagers was terrible as well, alongside the unclean conditions and all that sort of stuff. I can't begin to explain how bad the conditions were and how little the Government reacted. Catzsy you say that it was a good evacuation. But the government did literally NOTHING. It was all the Army doing it for themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by CNN
Well I didnt say it was a good evacuation just quoted what was on wikipedia but I really do not have an indepth knowledge but it seems from that the Mayor was involved so that is goverment. The handling of the people left behind seems to have been badly handled though.
Wikipedia is usually crap since anybody can update it and make up stuff I assume but yeah :) I would class Mayor as local government, so he didn't have much of a say.