so if an admin gives an unfair infraction then you're screwed? that's harsh.
Printable View
I was addressing the fact that Catzsy mentioned his activity, and so I talked about Moderator logs. Otherwise activity could only be defined by the amount of time we're online, could it not? I don't see how that would be accurately measurable. Effort can't really be measured also.
Also, I used to be a Forum Moderator pre to that. I'm not sure for how long and I'm not sure when but I believe that it was enough time to prove myself, until of course I got myself fired because of unrelated reasons to the job.
Lets put this into perspective then, how would you feel if you had been here alot longer than someone else, and made the same effort, week in, week out, and they got promoted ahead of you? Since your obviously making a statement saying you are a more active moderator than Bomb-Head and thus deserved the promotion before him.
2-3 Months
v
6-7 Months
No offence, but need i say anymore?
Luke, it's the work that you do, not the time of your presence.
I agree that people that've been around longer have more experience, so should be promoted first.
Rather than promote everyone at the same time.
But as said before, if you both put in the same effort over a day, it's the one that's been around longer that should get promoted first.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aflux
If somebody is a better moderator then they should be promoted first. Of course, in general, a moderator who has been a mod for longer will have more experience and so will usually be a better moderator but that can't always be the case.