WAYHEY! What did I say Saurav, didn't follow-on :8 What a bad decision that was.. they played bad in second innings (minus laxman and ganguly)
And blimey, we ain't lost no wickets yet, very slim chance still :o
Printable View
WAYHEY! What did I say Saurav, didn't follow-on :8 What a bad decision that was.. they played bad in second innings (minus laxman and ganguly)
And blimey, we ain't lost no wickets yet, very slim chance still :o
I doubt England will win unless they start playing this like a ODI. England are in a "do or die" situation. India's choice not to follow-on was good and bad.
If they followed on, they could have won by an innings. Also, it would have put England under pressure having to follow-on.
And not choosing follow-on was a good decision as its very hard to bat on that pitch on day 5. I dont think India wanted to bat on day 5 if they had to. But well dont to England for doing so well today. If India dont get early wickets, they will get very nervous.
I wouldn't be that scared, cook and strauss have never had a 100 run partnership..
prior is underpreforming
and i'm not sure is sidebottom will bat
we need 5 runs per over to win. highly unlikely but we do have players capable of doing it!
I hate it when people go "Prior is great. A century on his test debut!" Grr, that was against West Indies ... who are crap.
And the 100 partnership is still possible, just like Kumbles 100 :p If England do some how manage to win, the public wont be too happy with Dravid and the team.
They aren't that bad, at ODI's.. Tests they are pretty rubbish though yeah. It's not the batsmen that matters to me, it's the wicketkeepr :@Quote:
Originally Posted by Saurav
yeah it is still possibly, but they always do rubbish after sessions restart.
and no they won't hahaha.
I always thought England were better at tests than ODI's.
I dont think India need a coach. Ever since the coach resigned, India are doing really well. They even beat South Africa xD Now the BCCI is actually considering whether or not they should get a coach. They have like 3 ex-Indian players training them atm (I think).
Sorry I should of started a new paragraph, England are better at tests, but WI are better at ODI's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Saurav
And yeah I do agree with you there, India do look pretty well organised, but what will happen when the middle 4 eventually retire? (please be soon)..
Even though tendulkar said he will be gone before the next world cup, I dont think he will. He will want to leave with pride and in the last world cup, he did crap. I think he will resign straight after the next world cup.
When Dravid, Ganguly and Tendulkar resign, India will go downhill for a while. They will need more and better batsmen. Tbh, those three didnt really perform much earlier this year.
Yuvraj Sign and Dhoni are good.
Singh is very good, I'm surprised he hasn't been brought in yet, possibly for Dravid, since he hasn't preformed so well this series.
I think Dravid or Laxman will be the first to leave.. Tendulkar is wanting to make his records unbreakable.
How old is Tendulkar now? 36? India return to England in 2011, Bumble and Nasser were saying he'd only be 38 then, the donuts... he'll do a Lara then possibly leave to that new ICP company, or whatever it is, that a fair few former internationals are going to, possibly Inzamam ul-haq!
Indian Cricket League - ICL
Grr, India didnt bowl too good today.