What's wrong with fireworks. It owns when coding... >:l
Printable View
What's wrong with fireworks. It owns when coding... >:l
lmao, ;) if you say so :)
Hes saying that because he doesen't like it :\
yeh true :) hate the way its set out ;)
Sorry, i just get annoyed as everyone on this forum calls an image a layout, As to be alyout ity woudl have to be coded, and woulnt actaly nessary need any images at all, the codeing being the bigger bit.
coded properly, aka, resivable tables to fit browsers, text rather than image based writings, and usiang backgroun colring rather than useing a large image, etc. Then would be good.
So im no longer going to rate a layout unless it is a layout.
ps. i hate fireworks the code it genrates is waistful and near imposible to work with
Gawd calm down dude :'(
it will be coded there for a layout :)
Hes coding it in 20/30 mins its my site :|
>=o i don't do that i hope... and who in their right mind would use images for text anyway? And also using a background picture for the background would just be insane, when it takes up more space or your hosting 2 have it there! LOL :')
true :) i have to get out of the habbit of using iframes >: ( for navs, lol
fireworks codeing does use iamge for backgrounds, plus puting layers over a image based site does cause that problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by simplesimon12
By image based writing, doenst usealy apply to body, but say the sectoions, down the side, people may use 6 diffent images, with diffent writing on them, rather than just load one image, and use a few times and put text on top of them "/