More / Better Moderators needed.

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

21-09-2007, 08:04 PM
Soil

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattmeister

:O, why do you say that? :P

Well in Discuss Anything. Out of the three mods, I have only seen you post and moderate. Maybe matt64 and devil.wont.Cry do edit. I cant really comment as I cant see mod logs etc.

But either way, better moderators or more moderators are needed in that forum.

I think every forum should have 4 moderators each.
Also, assign two super moderators to each catagory (so their main focus is that catagory, but they can also moderate other forums too). As super moderators moderate all forums, I am sure they dont visit a lot of forums.
21-09-2007, 08:05 PM
today

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saurav

Well in Discuss Anything. Out of the three mods, I have only seen you post and moderate. Maybe matt64 and devil.wont.Cry do edit. I cant really comment as I cant see mod logs etc.

But either way, better moderators or more moderators are needed in that forum.

I've seen Mat64 a few times but not devil.wont.cry :]
21-09-2007, 08:05 PM
cocaine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hollywood

Well i thought there was, there's never enough moderators around i think a new moderation system is needed. (:

Maybe three super mods per section and then how ever many forums devided by the three moderators and rounded up for the moderators? Or for every two forums there should be 4 moderators? (Depending on how active they are)

As your well known and you actually been around for a good while :]

dont forget that smods moderate the WHOLE forum, they cant be assigned to certain forums, then they would be normal mods

+ thanks (:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saurav

Well in Discuss Anything. Out of the three mods, I have only seen you post and moderate. Maybe matt64 and devil.wont.Cry do edit. I cant really comment as I cant see mod logs etc.

But either way, better moderators or more moderators are needed in that forum.

and thanks :D
21-09-2007, 08:08 PM
today

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattmeister

dont forget that smods moderate the WHOLE forum, they cant be assigned to certain forums, then they would be normal mods

+ thanks (:

and thanks :D

Yes but it doesnt mean they cant keep to a certain section, i think it would be better then they each have their own section though they can search other sections if needed, but they have a section each, two super mods to each section (:

It seems good to me :]
21-09-2007, 08:11 PM
Soil

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hollywood

Yes but it doesnt mean they cant keep to a certain section, i think it would be better then they each have their own section though they can search other sections if needed, but they have a section each, two super mods to each section (:

It seems good to me :]

Read my first post on this page :) but your summed it up better than I did.
The moderation on this forum sucks. I blame the forum manager, who ever that is (not really looked at announcements or staff list etc)
21-09-2007, 08:14 PM
Ed.

Also there are so many rules broken in that section every minute - its hard to keep up..
21-09-2007, 08:15 PM
mat64

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saurav

If they dont come online then just fire them. There is no point having forum rules if most moderators dont do anything.

Mattmeister, you are the only moderator who actually deserves a job.

I do agree, mattmeister is doing a very good job at the moment, Just because he is the only one you see do work doesn't necessarily make it the case. If you look back at the previous week before the the new batch started I moderating quite alot, Although now matt picks up on things very quickly, and I'm away doing other things, and when It comes to checking the forums most of the work is already done. Moderation is usually quite swift these days. Also, Our guideline for moving threads, As some listed in your original post. Is that if it's possible they can be discussed in this section quite comfortably then there is no need to move them.
21-09-2007, 08:16 PM
Soil

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdHawks

Also there are so many rules broken in that section every minute - its hard to keep up..

It should make it easier then? I dont see many mod edits.
And if that forum has a lot of rule breaking then assign more moderators to that forum :s

Excuses excuses excuses :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by mat64

I do agree, mattmeister is doing a very good job at the moment, Just because he is the only one you see do work doesn't necessarily make it the case. If you look back at the previous week before the the new batch started I moderating quite alot, Although now matt picks up on things very quickly, and I'm away doing other things, and when It comes to checking the forums most of the work is already done. Moderation is usually quite swift these days. Also, Our guideline for moving threads, As some listed in your original post. Is that if it's possible they can be discussed in this section quite comfortably then there is no need to move them.

Sorry I just remembered I have seen a lot of your edits. Like I said, I cant comment on how hard you work as I cant see mod logs.
21-09-2007, 08:18 PM
today

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saurav

Read my first post on this page :) but your summed it up better than I did.
The moderation on this forum sucks. I blame the forum manager, who ever that is (not really looked at announcements or staff list etc)

Each section has two super moderators assigned to that section, though they can do other sections (if they have time) that means Six more will need to be picked, i can name a few normal moderators who could become super moderators.

So we've got the super moderators (minus comments, feedback section and VIP) and 19 moderators (inc trialists) thats really not enough, i think at least another 21 should be hired, though there are more active forums then others as you can tell and we know which ones are active for the 'non active' forums maybe one moderator is enough as there's super moderators to cover if needed. Though for the active forums such as spam, discuss anything there really needs to be four active moderators, which at least two come on each day to check, or at least one with a super moderator active, this would soon clear up any problems.

There are some flaws in this idea such as we cant hrie super moderators just like that, but im sure you do back ups? Along with you know who you can trust and who you cant. (:

//Edit:
Mat64 did a few edits from what i seen including threads i've replied to and dealt with the issues correctly, (: As i reported them, lol =]
21-09-2007, 08:18 PM
Ed.

Look - its blatent why you posted this.

Did you apply for MOD and not get it??

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page