Yeah, i've saw like 3 people with it,
and it doesn't matter Corey, if they have a picture of themselves it's not allowed, if it's another person that they don't have permission to put up [discluding celebrities] then it's still rule-breaking.
Printable View
Yeah, i've saw like 3 people with it,
and it doesn't matter Corey, if they have a picture of themselves it's not allowed, if it's another person that they don't have permission to put up [discluding celebrities] then it's still rule-breaking.
Out of curiosity, why aren't you allowed to post harmless photos of yourself? Like from a webcam or so on? If you are worried about paedophiles... Are they really that desperate to hunt down a member, who many hundreds of miles away, when they can find a victim within a mile from where they are?
I've never understood that rule "/
its stupid coz they say u cant post a direct image of urself but u can use a link :S defeats da idea dont it????
thanx
Habbox really must re-write their rules... If you break a rule, you can re-inforce why you broke it with another in most cases and effectively go free unless whoever it is who told you off does one mindless ramble which makes less sense than the rules to make you seem like you are in trouble.
Something I've noticed ever since Mizki and the like left, I mean, got fired.
why are ppl so obsessed wid paedophiles browsin the 4rum, if u want 2 get rid of PPL lyk...........nvrsoft.
the person hu wrote da rules is hypocritical
I've seen people with pictures of themself as their avatars, but there pictures have been edited so it isn't that clear to see them so it's not really going to be showing them to the world is it?