What a load of trash, paying people off would have resulted in him getting MORE time in jail. Like they would accept a pay-off.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeighHorse
Printable View
What a load of trash, paying people off would have resulted in him getting MORE time in jail. Like they would accept a pay-off.Quote:
Originally Posted by NeighHorse
Isn't it just a coincidence that the Judges called him innocent. And he's a multu-millionairre, plus it would ruin his reputation.
Omg, that is stupid. They had loads of evidence! Just cause he's famous :@ :Shock:
What was the actual evidence?Quote:
Originally Posted by Photographed
I thought it was just his word against theirs?
the contents of his pc apparntly, athogh that was "somehow" not mentioned in the caught case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spankadelic
Apparently, one of the members of the jury recieved an anonymous e-mail saying that if Michael Jackson was to be found guilty, there would be a terrorist attack on a major city in Europe.
HOWEVER, I think this is untrue, this was on a tv channel, and might I say, a sky channel which is unknown... There's no way someone could of known who was on the jury, nevermind send them an e-mail like that. Quite a silly channel, take it off your teleboxes!!! Stupid fat channel producers. -Cough- Go and get some viewers -Cough-
( But the question springs to mind, why was I watching this channel? :eusa_doh: )
Wow, this post is weird. Not like me to make such weird posts... ;)
If it was anyone else on that dock, I think they would have found him guilty. I certainly thought he would have been found guilty. It goes to show that even the best of us can be wrong :P
Remember this thread ages ago? http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...1&page=1&pp=10
Read my post.. Read most other peoples posts...
I hate to say i told you so...
But...
TOLD YOU SO!...
Now you just have to watch for the new albums and new fans. He's going to gain alot of respect, he will tell everyone about this tragic experience and everyone will feel sorry for him, believe me, the guy isn't stupid enough to go out and rape a little boy, it's all >PLANNED< which means that it was intentional for the little boy to give false stories and no evidence.
I rest my case...
Scarily enogh, im actaly starting to think there could be some truth in this. Plus that trail seiosly seemed rigged to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by la-ur-en
Hmmm, Did u no there is no law about sharing a bed with a child or showing rude pictures or films to a child. How messed is that?