-:Undertaker:- banned.

Aww. Dan banned.

Thats completely "censored" <--- Censorship ftl

He always put in a good debate and you could really have fun talking to him too.

Goodbye Mr.Gravedigger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by le harry

it was bound to happen sooner or later.

---

It was, specially with the anti habbox speech he had.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by danandthe3gifts

I didn't actually mention HHGS on that thread until someone else did, hell, I didn't even advertise it at all, again you are wrong. It's permanent and the reason is; being too negative in my viewpoints.

---

You were so full on on making hhgs look really good, by advertising on a site that is clearly better and putting positive views on your site and negative views on Habbox. Habbox has been running longer, has better staff, has more trusted values. Your opinons were all one sided.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by danandthe3gifts

I know, still even through it all I still believe what me, majority of my department and the public believe. :)



No because the fact is you can't argue for a toffee. I always back up my arguements but then get called a racist for them by people who don't know what their on about just like you. It isn't racist to be tough on immigration.

---

Hmm great comeback dan! I also get -Rep's for being 'racist' even though i am 100% aggainst racism!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GoldenMerc

Sorry but i find it unfair that Dan gets in trouble because all the Habbox 'lovers' No not everyone just some of them, Stick up for Habbox yes thats fine aslong as you put a good point across not like 'hhgs is ****' or 'hhgs copied habbox' If you notice me nor Dan never bring HHGS into it untill they do then we argue our point, We also prove them wrong but Dan still gets fired.
Wow this is negative -BANZ-
Ross

---

Hmm, i kinda of agree there except I do think it is annopying when dan says: You could always check hhgs for values. I am fine if he did that on hhgs, but on here its not right.

i do not know if anyone from habbox does that on hhgs but personally i don't think either site should do it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by e5

You were so full on on making hhgs look really good, by advertising on a site that is clearly better and putting positive views on your site and negative views on Habbox. Habbox has been running longer, has better staff, has more trusted values. Your opinons were all one sided.

---

Totally agree there! He did. It is always: 'Check HHGS for values'

Habbox was the first decent site for values, and since Habbox has there own values, i don't think anyone need's to go on HxF then only use HHGS values!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by e5

You were so full on on making hhgs look really good, by advertising on a site that is clearly better and putting positive views on your site and negative views on Habbox. Habbox has been running longer, has better staff, has more trusted values. Your opinons were all one sided.

---

I would say HHGS values are better wouldn't I because guess what? - I WORK THERE! - Habbox's values on a few things are quite far out, infact it was axctually me who told Immenseman to look into the Throne's value and that's why it was changed. I have been helping with Habbox's values even since Jake took RVM up - If I heard about a certain super rare changing, I would tell him. I like Habbox, as I have alreayd said, the forum is great and the people on it are - it's the management which ruins it.

Quote:

---

Totally agree there! He did. It is always: 'Check HHGS for values'

Habbox was the first decent site for values, and since Habbox has there own values, i don't think anyone need's to go on HxF then only use HHGS values!

---

If I do mention HHGS values in threads it's usually because Habbox haven't got the rare on their pages. I haven't advertised HHGS in a long time, except have a signature which a lot of people on this forum have, advertising their sites.

The arguement right now, is not which sites values are better, infact the debate last night wasn't even about values, it was about three rares.

This is a total joke

I posted my views here
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=475686

so not writing them again.

:eusa_wall

Every single rare values site out there have gotten their inspiration from Habbox. People use Habbox to base their values and then just up the value by a few hc or something. There's not much point in using any other rare value sites. People say "Oh i'd like change in rare values" but that's not going to happen at the rate of knots Habbox is improving by, every second.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by e5

You were so full on on making hhgs look really good, by advertising on a site that is clearly better and putting positive views on your site and negative views on Habbox. Habbox has been running longer, has better staff, has more trusted values. Your opinons were all one sided.

---

See once again someone brings it in and the 'Habbox Lovers' come into place, Your being totally one sided here and just thinking 'Habbox is the best it has the best values' I mean do you know how much Dan works on values?
I can tell you right now he does atleast twice as much valueing than Jake. Me,Dan And Jake all know that.
You also say better staff, I mean how the **** can you say that, Do you work for HHGS?
Have you ever worked for HHGS?
Shut up Elliot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by danandthe3gifts

I would say HHGS values are better wouldn't I because guess what? - I WORK THERE! - Habbox's values on a few things are quite far out, infact it was axctually me who told Immenseman to look into the Throne's value and that's why it was changed. I have been helping with Habbox's values even since Jake took RVM up - If I heard about a certain super rare changing, I would tell him. I like Habbox, as I have alreayd said, the forum is great and the people on it are - it's the management which ruins it.

The arguement right now, is not which sites values are better, infact the debate last night wasn't even about values, it was about three rares.

---

You're still being one sided now. I don't really care who works harder, it's just the fact that Habbox have better values, even without trying. So it's obviously saying something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GoldenMerc

See once again someone brings it in and the 'Habbox Lovers' come into place, Your being totally one sided here and just thinking 'Habbox is the best it has the best values' I mean do you know how much Dan works on values?
I can tell you right now he does atleast twice as much valueing than Jake. Me,Dan And Jake all know that.
You also say better staff, I mean how the **** can you say that, Do you work for HHGS?
Have you ever worked for HHGS?
Shut up Elliot.

---

Ross, you for one are a prime example of Habbox having better staff. Firstly your being rude and even swearing at me. From what I know, a good staff is made up of polite, friendly and impartial people. You're not. Habbox Management are fair in what they say, they don't go around saying HABBO #1. If there is a fansite to be spoken about, they talk about it 2 sidedly, being fair on Habbox and that fansite.

If you really feel to need to stick up for your site so much, it can hardly be better if Habbox can be impartial and still get more unique hits, forum members etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GoldenMerc

See once again someone brings it in and the 'Habbox Lovers' come into place, Your being totally one sided here and just thinking 'Habbox is the best it has the best values' I mean do you know how much Dan works on values?
I can tell you right now he does atleast twice as much valueing than Jake. Me,Dan And Jake all know that.
You also say better staff, I mean how the **** can you say that, Do you work for HHGS?
Have you ever worked for HHGS?
Shut up Elliot.

---

i have!! and its not the best staff team in the world. :eusa_whis