Looks over personality for a relationship. Shallow yes, but i'd rather **** a babe then a toad.
Printable View
Looks over personality for a relationship. Shallow yes, but i'd rather **** a babe then a toad.
I go for both.
If i think someone is fit then i will want to get to know them a lot better in a gf type of way. If they are really fun/ good personality i would want to be a really good mate with them.
But if they are boring and a barbi doll then thats just as bad as having a couch potato as a gf :)
Someones looks make me want to get to know the person.
I do agree personality is important espically in long term realtionships you wouldn't wanna be talking to a wall your whole life.
An then again you wouldn't wanna be walking around with the ugliest thing in town..
everyone wants a balance of the two.
if they don't they're too shallow to realise it and want a **** buddy instead of a proper relationship.
They would have to be attractive, but not too attractive as it would be difficult to imagine being with someone far more attractive as yourself as humans naturally have a negative pessimistic view of themselves. I wouldn't go just for looks because if they aren't actually interesting to be around, I would get bored rather quickly.
Both are important in a way. But you generally love someone you get along with and you can relate to them, so in some cases personality can overrule looks.
to be fair, i'm not going to go up to a very ugly person and start a conversation with them so rly, how am I gonna do what kinda personality they have? in saying that though, if a guy can make me laugh then ye that's all that matters!
I'd definitely go for personality. Looks are just an added bonus.