Child dying in englnd or a troop dying in iraq

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jordy

Neither, they're both useless as the troop is clearly useless and crap at his job if he died and the child is useless to society, they don't work and hardly pay any taxes.

Sorry my bad sense of humour... I don't really think you can choose between the two, two of the most important sectors of Society so they're obviously both important.

---

After saying that, i think you deserve it other them two!

Even if you are joking its such a horrible thing to say!

Ask their mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters etc etc! Neither in my opinion, as they are both of equal importance. A soldier could also be a parent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jordy

Neither, they're both useless as the troop is clearly useless and crap at his job if he died and the child is useless to society, they don't work and hardly pay any taxes.

Sorry my bad sense of humour... I don't really think you can choose between the two, two of the most important sectors of Society so they're obviously both important.

---

Even if its a joke that's a terrible thing to say.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ohirian

Even if its a joke that's a terrible thing to say.

---

It's not a bad thing to say, as he was cracking a joke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JOSH

It's not a bad thing to say, as he was cracking a joke.

---

Just because its a "joke" doesnt mean that it was a ok thing to say

Let the English die!


Nah, let the soldier die, I say. He signed up, he knew the risks he was taking and one of them was being killed. The child will also be able to live more of it's life.

I say a person in iraq

The Child obviously.

The soldiers know the risks they are taking joining the army, but I child dosn't exactly take the risks to get murdered to they?

Child.

Army dude going into the army knowing they could die, which is their own choice.

The child doesn't live to be killed, and doesn't do anything like go in to the army...

Child...