copying my point, -rep :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by GommeInc
it's an unnecessary rule. if anyone is going to get down and dirty, like ryan often does there are other rules which cover the rule break. it's way too specific.
Printable View
copying my point, -rep :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by GommeInc
it's an unnecessary rule. if anyone is going to get down and dirty, like ryan often does there are other rules which cover the rule break. it's way too specific.
The "sexual nature" rule doesn't exist on it's own anymore.
There are specific rules regarding sex and they can be found here
It is not allowed to discuss sexual acts :), the other threads could be looked upon as in an advisory capacity.
Edit, for lazy people:
Quote:
Sexual Content which is ALLOWED:
- Sexual Health issues & advice providing descriptions are not graphic and the content is not obscene & may disturb other users.
- Contraceptive issues & advice
- Age concerns/advice regarding entering sexual relationships
- Sexuality issues/advice.
Sexual Content which is NOT ALLOWED
- Describing or discussing sexual acts
- Any images (including in situations listed in the "allowed" section.)
- Graphic descriptions of sexual organs
- Any sexual content that may offend and/or disturb other users.
- Discussing non-health issues regarding sexual organs.
- Telling of 'Sex stories'.
Having sex is a sexual act - Mentor's thread asks if people have had sex. That's discussing the sexual act of sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by invincible
Confussing.
Mentors threads have been extremely borderline, as a moderator of the section i've been in contact with Mentor and he understands these are borderline. I've discussed these polls in detail with forum management and they do all hold some kind of advisory capacity and these threads are closelymoderated to avoid people saying just a little too much.Quote:
Originally Posted by adammm
A thread discussing how sex feels is completely over the line.
So what about the idiots in the spam forum forever pleasuring themselves over girls, in particular Jennifer, using innuendo 24/7?
ryt k I get Adam, shouldn't the rule be "do not describe sexual acts" instead of discussing? There is a difference between the two. Like it's been said Mentor's doesn't require an indepth answer which goes into detail and it's usually just a poll so yes we know he's not breaking the rules so far but if the rule says no discussing sexual acts which he is doing then it's a bit of a contradiction whereas if you changed it to "do not describe" then the rule would be valid and he wouldn't be breaking the rule:S
oi adam :@ I think the rule should be imported into spam wayyy more than it already is because it's well getting out of hand -glare at gomme & sammeth-
Stupid rule
stupid stupid
Supposed to be a teen forum, one of the main thing teens talk about is sexual intercourse
gay stuff is allowed. due to the current forum management.Quote:
Originally Posted by buttons
I see your point, however I don't think discussing sex in itself should be allowed, mentor is discussing sexual relationships.Quote:
Originally Posted by buttons
It's supposed to be a Habbo Related forum actually.Quote:
Originally Posted by Soy
@ the person who said people use innuendo to perv over jen, I haven't seen any directly myself but if jen/someone else reports it it would be dealt with appropriately.
No, I was refering to those polls that were in the Teen forum
There should be some exceptions made there