Originally Posted by
Zhris
I didn't say everyone was wrong (especially not everyone with a brain cell, which would include anyone in the world). As I said, to those who I accussed of being wrong, theres proof by the suitable rare value changes a few weeks after the fall in HC Sofas (which dragged those rares down, and shouldn't have, but has now been ammended).
I like most others use Habbox rare values as a "basis" as they provide near enough accurate values about most rares. Rares over 1.0 are usually sold at their habbox value, whereas I find rares below that will vary in the price they are sold.
We use habbox because it is the most widely used rare values website/ has been accepted, and is likely to stay that way. I could start my own website, but whats the point unless I felt like sharing my personal valuations, which I don't.
You don't seem to understand that no habbo/some habbo's can be the voice of every habbo, therefore you can never be certain of the value of something just because a few people traded for that price. Although this is usually a very close indicator.
By saying "get 100's of views per day just for rare values alone, and then watch people claim you are corrupt" seems as if you have also accepted that corruption occurs if you are saying that I will also get those claims, therefore I don't need to prove anything. Although as I mentioned before, the brown pod value when it was at 3.0 was definately incorrect as just a couple of days before I was paying 2c per and managed to buy 16. And anyway, I have nothing to prove to you, unlikely to make any difference, and what do you want me to do anyway, screenie people saying "CORRUPT!" or what. Any ridicoulously high values are proof enough, even though some may have been a mistake. Just to add, i've also known valuers to hoard certain furnis, which never fail to rise in value.
About your purple dragon comment, I hadn't said anything like that. I would agree that if a trade is made, then the value SHOULDN'T be changed based on that ONE trade. That has nothing to do with anything i've said.
I would also appreciate it if you had a more constructive comment, rather than argueing with me telling me to prove things.
Thanks,
Chris