Explain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Recursion
I used to think this, but I'm now the other way around. The only disadvantage to the slim is the way it looks. George Foreman FTL.
Printable View
Explain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Recursion
I used to think this, but I'm now the other way around. The only disadvantage to the slim is the way it looks. George Foreman FTL.
Doesn't have the fat one have more features (some have PS2 compatability and more USB ports, it could install linux until recently, has a power switch on the back to actually switch the thing off instead of standby). Now I think about it, most of the compelling features of the fat one have been arbitrarily taken away by sony... for shame!
I like the touch-sensitive parts of the fat PS3. The new one has buttons which make it boring :( Not sure what the other differences are apart from that, and the size difference. As far as I am aware, PS2 compatibility only existed with the 60GB PS3 as well as extra USB ports. The slim has the same amount as the last fat one :P
No it ain't! Slim is tiny in comparison with the fat and uses less power, and doesn't have the bugs that the fat had like the 29th of february one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Recursion
Yeh I won't be too pleased if Sony bring out yet another new console since I dished out full price for my slim and a new console is likely to mean some sort of other new feature which will be incompatible with my current 120GB slim.