Well it wouldn't damage their sales if they get some money from it? lols.
release it after the remake.
Printable View
Well it wouldn't damage their sales if they get some money from it? lols.
release it after the remake.
Saying Goldeneye on Xbox wouldn't damage Nintendo is like saying Halo on Wii wouldn't damage Microsoft in my opinion. I'd consider buying an Xbox if it had Goldeneye and this is directly eating into my "Gaming budget". Even if you personally don't believe it would damage their sales you still can't complain at them like Neil did, business is business. Nintendo wants to maximise their profits and they clearly thought they wouldn't do it by releasing one of their most famous games on a rival console. It has nothing to do with "manning up" :)
Nintendo could release Mario on another console at this point and still have good sales because it's Nintendo, if you seriously think the console with the most sales currently have a multiplatform Goldeneye game will damage sales then something is wrong, like I already said, only hardcore fans would actually go out and buy a Wii for it and even then it probably wont be that great, they will probably sell a lot of copies but it's hardly damaging them at all if they release to PS3 or Xbox since every sold unit would get them money either way, so they'll profit whether it's multiplatform or not, as it stands now it's just another Publisher/Developer thing were they can't just grow up and make everything multiplatform, that way games will be released in the forms they were meant to be released in. ¬¬Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPinkPanther
Thats even more ludicrous. I bought a Wii purely for Mario and thats the reason I own one. Sure I enjoy lots of other games but Galaxy 1 and Galaxy 2 are the sole reasons for me playing it so often. If they appeared on other consoles it would of course damage their sales as one of their core exclusives. The Wii's market is totally different to that of the PS3 or 360, the Wii thrives on exclusives whereas the PS3 and 360 thrive mainly on the services they provide (XBL etc) since their most popular games are often the multi-platform ones. The Console market is MUCH more lucrative than the games market (particularly for Nintendo who make a profit on every console), the money that Nintendo would make for sales on other platforms is nothing compared to the money they make from consoles. They take in around $3 Billion a year net income I believe. By giving away their exclusives they would make a few million $'s in software sales but even if it took just 10% away from their overall yearly revenue thats still $300 Million.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
Nintendo is in it for money, it will harm their revenue by giving away exclusives.
Goldeneye would not loose Ninento money because they would sell the IP for millions :P
Nintendo own the licensing rights to the original, why should they have to give it to Microsoft? Should Microsoft and Sony have to give Nintendo rights to their exclusives? I repeat, it has nothing to do with "manning up".
Ok now read again.
Nintendo will earn money either way.
If Goldeneye was multiplatform then, Microsoft will earn money that is split with Nintendo as well, Sony will do the same and the Nintendo sales will be their own.
This has nothing to do with "oh Nintendo need exclusives" the fact is, the game will sell better as a multiplatform game because to be fair, the Wii isn't as good as the PS3 or xbox for FPS games, Nintendo will not lose money because they'll earn money from 2 alternative streams as well as their own.
It's like trying to argue with a fanboy with you, try and think logically for the love of God.
This might fail anyway, the first Goldeneye was crap.
WHAT?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
Trust me I'm not a fanboy :). I own many consoles not produced by Ninty. You might not have read it but read what I said earlier in the thread but Nintendo makes almost no money on software sales. Their softwares primary function is to help sell their hardware which is where the real money comes from. If Nintendo made a few million pounds on sales of Goldeneye it would be nothing compared to the revenue they could lose from console sales. You can't blame them for not taking the risk, again it has nothing to do with "manning up". I appreciate Nintendo's software but if I owned neither an Xbox or a Wii and the Xbox had Goldeneye then I would seriously consider buying it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
Also the deal between Microsoft and Nintendo reportedly broke down because Microsoft wasn't offering enough money for the licence for it so Nintendo clearly thought they would generate very little profit.
Neil is just trolling.Quote:
Originally Posted by Apeel
Also, Nintendo would lose money if GoldenEye became a multi-platform game. Most console owners who have a Wii also own a PS3 or an Xbox 360. If the game was released on all consoles people would be more inclined to buy it for their other systems rather than the Wii due to its awkward controller and inferior graphics. A lot of people would also just casually pick up the game if it sounded interesting and was available for their system. Even if Nintendo made some kind of deal with Microsoft and Sony (which they won't because Nintendo are neither the publishers nor the developers of the game), they would not receive a substantial share of the profits. The game would sell best on PS3 and Xbox and Sony and Microsoft would make the most money, not Nintendo.