Why isn't the top contributor in the Debates section announced?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saurav

I don't really see the point :S. Oli said its very rare and only really happens when a different debate hasn't produced a good discussion. Most people will not go "omg why were there two winners and not just one" :S. Its just nitpicking.

---

Oh that's unusual for you - you are usually the first to say that the rules should be clear.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catzsy

Oh that's unusual for you - you are usually the first to say that the rules should be clear.

---

Its not a real. Its just information, and its very rare for there to be more than one winner. Most of the time, there is just one winner and there are usually only two winners if a other debate failed. The debates dept gets 4 VIPs per month so there can only be 4 winners.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saurav

Its not a real. Its just information, and its very rare for there to be more than one winner. Most of the time, there is just one winner and there are usually only two winners if a other debate failed. The debates dept gets 4 VIPs per month so there can only be 4 winners.

---

Anything official like that are rules/guidelines to me - those are what Habbox goes by and if they don't and if there can be 4 winners all the more reason for amendment. You are entitled to your opinion of course but you can't actually give me an answer on behalf of the management, can you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catzsy

Anything official like that are rules/guidelines to me - those are what Habbox goes by and if they don't and if there can be 4 winners all the more reason for amendment. You are entitled to your opinion of course but you can't actually give me an answer on behalf of the management, can you?

---

I am not too sure what you mean by the last line, but its just information. There are 4 debates and 4 VIPs. Each debate gets 1 winner, on the rare occasion (like twice every 6 months) there happens to be two. No big deal. Just nitpicking really.

There are many things which are slightly inaccurate in FAQ, why not change every single thing :S. People are expected to use common sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saurav

I am not too sure what you mean by the last line, but its just information. There are 4 debates and 4 VIPs. Each debate gets 1 winner, on the rare occasion (like twice every 6 months) there happens to be two. No big deal. Just nitpicking really.

There are many things which are slightly inaccurate in FAQ, why not change every single thing :S. People are expected to use common sense.

---

I mean that any amendment would have to be sanctioned by the management and I think your opinion on it is quite well known by now. It cannot be classed as slightly inaccurate when it is stated as one member when in fact it could be four. That would be like saying you win 1 months VIP when in fact it could be four?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Catzsy

I mean that any amendment would have to be sanctioned by the management and I think your opinion on it is quite well known by now. It cannot be classed as slightly inaccurate when it is stated as one member when in fact it could be four. That would be like saying you win 1 months VIP when in fact it could be four?

---

4 people winning the VIP for a debate is pretty much never going to happen and we both know it. Its common sense and the fact is, they have 4 vips to give away and 4 debates. Maximum will probably ever only be two.
Management know your opinion too so why do you keep replying then :s if you are asking me to stop?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saurav

The chances of 4 people winning the VIP for a debate in pretty much never going to happen and we both know it. Its common sense and the fact is, they have 4 vips to give away and 4 debates. Maximum will probably ever only be two.
Management know your opinion too so why do you keep replying then :s if you are asking me to stop?

---

Fair comment I will just wait and see. :)

Woah, a lot of discussion has gone into this - paying a lot of attention to detail but still I have changed it:

Quote:

---

At the end of this fortnightly period, the Debates Leader will close the thread the top contributor(s) will be awarded 1 month’s worth of VIP subscription on the forum

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oli

Woah, a lot of discussion has gone into this - paying a lot of attention to detail but still I have changed it:

---

Looks good - yes a lot of discussion when it just required an answer like yours really and it looks much better. :)

kk, but now watch some members think "i contributed a lot and only one person won".