Quote:
Originally Posted by
Conservative,
I think it's stupid to have pageants for 1/2/3/4 year olds - because they barely understand what's happening, and it's just the parents trying to make some money out of the "beauty" of their daughter/son. << Not all pageants are for girls may I say.
Agreed - but IMO I don't think it's WRONG as such, it's just like being models as a baby - only exploitive if something happens that probably shouldn't...
Quote:
However, I think once they're at the age of 12/13/14/15 where they KNOW what it is, and it's their choice, then I don't see the problem.
Still at this age, the parents have a MAJOR influence over the decisions of the child - and the parent has to sign the release forms saying that the child is allowed to do it so...
Quote:
And as others have said, it's not just beauty that is judged, and it's not going to help by letting fat girls win beauty pageants. Beauty pageants are for BEAUTY (and other skills etc.). People are naturally biased towards pretty girls, I don't think letting fat girls win beauty pageants would change that, nor would scrapping them.
It's a common disbelief that only stick thin girls win beauty pageants. Just because we see the "Miss America 2k10" as this pretty, blonde, anorexic girl, all contestants have to look like that? And "miss *insert county/country name here*" aren't the only beauty pageants - there's a lot more worldwide, using all kinds of contestants as winners.
Quote:
If people want to hold them, then let them. It doesn't harm society really. Maybe the way to solve it is to have pageants for "bigger" girls, boys, whatever. But I still doubt that would change how people view beauty in general.
This could honestly be seen as discrimination. Can you imagine the competition? "Beauty Pageant for Fat Girls" - that's going to go down a storm... and there are pageants for boys already out there, although less - due to the lower demand for them.