Printable View
You say that, but if we just left them to it the country would end up split and in ruins. You know Britain & other European countries are a magnet for refugees. At least if we help we have a chance of keeping Libya a stable enough country for them to stay there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Casanova
Britain doesn't need another oilfield. we have enough. we need to stay out of this one and hope that the transitional council will be fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by QuotePort
Your attitude is ignorant to the fact if it did 'split' then there'd be no need for refugee's.
Hey, I thought we were having a debate here. No need to call me ignorant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Casanova
How many people from Iraq & Afghanistan live over here now since the war? Alot!
I would say capture because killing him would create more problems.
Hmmmmmm , I also agree with capturing :D
Only because we were too stupid to allow them, asylum laws (internationally agreed) state that asylum seekers should seek safety in the first safe country that they cross into. As Britain is an island nation surrounded by continental nations which are considered safe, we should have no asylum seekers at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by QuotePort
I've got to agree with the statement above.
I wouldn't do anything, it has nothing to do with me, it's not my fault their government was so ****e and created a huge spark leading to rebel groups forming.
I'd capture him. I don't see what good killing him does and to use a cliché to kill him would be a crime so you're just as bad as him, a criminal. At the end of the day he has told his army to shoot at his own people. He should be locked up and made to pay for what he has done.
I would capture him, and let a judge give him a sentence.