I personally am against this. It's against our rights, and to take advantage of a child at birth who can't defend their rights should simply be illegal.
Printable View
I personally am against this. It's against our rights, and to take advantage of a child at birth who can't defend their rights should simply be illegal.
Perhaps we could all meet in the middle and make it mandatory to have DNA taken but it could then be destroyed if the parents want as soon as it's been tested for genes that carry Cystic Fibrosis and stuff.
I don't see how this is even a debate. I don't see how people can even say "don't allow them to"...
As long as it's for good purposes, one of which may be easier to stop criminals, murders etc from doing any more damage to earth. As long as it's for good things, I don't see this taking advantage of our rights ok