At what age? For 18 years your body is donated, not out of choice.
Printable View
If you murder people in Wales, ignoring the fact you are killing people, you'll be doing a good thing wouldn't you... Giving organs to the people that need them?
---------- Post added 03-07-2013 at 07:34 PM ----------
As for the topic at hand, I can see what issues it may cause. People that are unaware of this will suffer. I can imagine a fair few people being upset to find that their dead relatives have been carved apart without their knowledge or consent, simply because they were unaware that the law changed.
Personally, I'm undecided. I'm not an organ donor now... And whether I will be after death I'd rather leave up to my family that I leave behind, and whether or not they're comfortable with it.
I think it's a great idea and will save many lives!
I can see Dan's point. It shouldn't really be for the state to decide. HOWEVER, so very few people actually opt-in to become an organ donor. So you're stuck really. You can't get the NHS sending out forms to everyone because very few people actually care about filling in a form, and you can't really harass them in the street like they did/do with "Give Blood" campaigns. In a way, the opt-out system works purely because it's the only way of getting people to motivate themselves into doing something, out of fear or anger. It's usually how these opt-in/out systems operate effectively.
I came across a great Ron Paul quote on Facebook today that can be applied to this debate, here it is.
http://www.ezimba.com/work/130704C/e...1028380200.png
I reject the use of force by the state, and it's as simple as that - even when it can sometimes benefit parts or most of society.
If we need more organs, and we do, and it's a noble cause that many of us may have to rely on in the future - then instead of the state suddenly saying "all of your organs belong automatically to the state upon death despite you not signing anything" people ought to sign up. And if enough people haven't signed up then obviously a better campaign method needs to be launched in getting people to sign up; one idea I can think of is only allowing those who are on the organ donator register (and I am currently not) first place in any transplant list... that is something that would be an acceptable way to go about it.
I ask all of those saying this is a good idea, are you all currently signed up? if not, sign yourselves up before you force me to sign up.
I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardemax
Willing being the key word.
I don't need to be signed up ;)
But yes it is an interesting point you have raised, but going further on my final point, I truly believe that if you're unwilling to help another human through something like organ donation (opting out or not opting in), then you shouldn't receive organs at all. It's a bit like a double edged sword.