The student is scummy but teachers, shouldn't, no matter what, hit a student like that. He could have just held his arms back or moved away.
The student is scummy but teachers, shouldn't, no matter what, hit a student like that. He could have just held his arms back or moved away.
shocking
sacking a teacher because of that classless scumbag pupil attacking him. he restrained him, he didnt fight him back.
Idk what some of you are on about, but the teacher put the student in a headlock, he didn't punch him...?
I think some of my wording made it a little confusing, the teacher head locked the student but never hit him, it was more for self defenceQuote:
Originally Posted by Hayden
andddddd this is what's wrong with the world!
It's still physically touching a child - in an aggressive way, which isn't on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayden
It was the right thing to do. Your solution of not allowing teachers to defend themselves is just asinine. It doesn't matter how many teachers you call, if they're not allowed to touch the student whatsoever the student can just do whatever they want.Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrawrrr
Me and you hardly agree but this is great!Quote:
Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-
I fully 100% support this statement. Kids think they can rule the school :/
Which is a battery - unlawfully touching someone (only needs to be an unwanted touch too, doesn't have to be a punch).Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrawrrr
If the student hit him first, why has he no right to self defence himself. It comes natural to have a habbit of defening yourself.