2 a day whenever it's on would be better me thinks :p
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
2 a day whenever it's on would be better me thinks :p
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Defeats the purpose having a spur of the moment thing if you're going to give 24 hour notice........................Quote:
Originally Posted by Daltron
They're meant to randomly appear, not give you a day to make up some threads to get ready to post or replies to others so killing some activity as people are waiting to get double points..
24 hour notice would be stupid.
2 a day is acceptable (I assume it would be like 10gmt then 4gmt or something like that @Phil; )
Yeah something like that if I wake up in time ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by buttons
@Everyone; So you would rather spur of the moment or scheduled ones
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
Spur of the moment obviously
Scheduled ones are always going to make people wait to post in threads they'd normally instantly reply to which is just going to negatively effect activity on the day that it's been scheduled.
Definitely spur of the moment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil
Activity will drop before and after the designated time if scheduled.
I agree with Jen, spur of the moment is much better.
Yeah just do spur of the moment for UK suitable times. Idk why I bothered raising the issue
In the future I'll be doing random days. I might know when they are but nobody else will. On the days I do them in the future, I'll do two and hopefully most if not all of the members.
the fact is that there is zero point doing a 'spur of the moment' happy hour when there's only 1-2 people online as it won't be nearly as successful and you wouldn't have had many threads to actually post in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daltron