so vice versa - used to be legal for men to beat/rape their woman - does that mean its ok cause it was legal?
Printable View
so vice versa - used to be legal for men to beat/rape their woman - does that mean its ok cause it was legal?
lmfao ur saying that if someone broke the law in the past then it was valid at the time
I'm just trying to understand if that applies to people who OBEYED the law
it was valid in the legal sense yes. obviously not moral but whoever applies today's morals to the past is a dolt
and what do you mean on obeyed the law? are you talking about wrongful convictions that have been overturned? if so that's entirely different to a moral change in attitudes some decades later and issues apologies for it.
wish I could have broken this law