No not at all. Bergen Belsen was a dirty, swampy place to begin with. Not denying people wouldn't get sick there. The National Socialists only gave the Jews minimal food needed to survive. It wasn't a restaurant up there.
Printable View
No not at all. Bergen Belsen was a dirty, swampy place to begin with. Not denying people wouldn't get sick there. The National Socialists only gave the Jews minimal food needed to survive. It wasn't a restaurant up there.
Why the fuck are we discussing things like this on the forum? Wow. I say this as a neutral not as a forum staff member.
Surviving with a bit of bread is not the same as having healthy plumped out facial features like the random girl in the 1945 photo - who by the way has completely different bone shape to Anne too. The only similarity is that they have dark eyes and thick hair. Her head was shaved at Auschwitz just a year earlier and you also mention yourself that Anne would have whatever hair had grown back cut down in september of 1945, so for that girl on the right to be her (again in 1945) she'd have to have incredibly fast growing hair, far more so than anyone in the entire history of the world let alone a half-starved prisoner. *REMOVED*
Edited by the.games (Trialist Forum Moderator): Please do not be rude to other forum members.
Why bring Ann frank up it's a horrible thing to suggest she did not die also your forgetting the diary of Ann frank And the museum.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://www.annefrank.org/en/Anne-Fra...tory-in-brief/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mistakes are made, like numbers in dates as with this post - I meant to put 1944. Second, I'm not a photographic forensic expert, nor did I ever claim I was - so when it was pointed out that specific features were different, I dropped it. Even so, that girl had far shorter hair than Anne did 3 years prior. I don't think it's impossible for someone's hair to grow back in nearly 8 months of time, especially since different people have different growth rates. I also didn't state that Anne would've been well fed either, just that she would have had enough to survive. Second, not everyone who got typhus at Bergen Belsen fell gravely ill. Several people around Anne's age photographed at liberation had as minor symptoms as a rash on their faces, but otherwise looked healthy. The latest date historians speculate Anne Frank died is March 28th, 1945. Belsen was liberated roughly 2 weeks later. The only person who came out saying she died was Irma Sonnenberg Menkel, who left a gap in her story from seeing her die in her arms to later seeing her corpse in a mass grave that hasn't even been pinpointed yet. Fact is, MULTIPLE people saw Margot die. Either everyone else was gone from that bunk, or she just didn't die - more people would have noticed. Anne could have survived another 2 weeks, then the Red Cross would have been treating and feeding the released prisoners. Saying somebody didn't die is not hate speech, especially considering I have high respect for her as a person. So please don't call me disgustingly offensive when you've went as far as to troll me in the past and call me a vile creature. Show me a single post where I've mentioned hating Jews, because I've already mentioned my own uncle is Jewish. Saying I'm dangerous is disgustingly offensive.
- - - Updated - - -
Please direct me to a photograph of her body or the location of the mass grave, or fix the gaping holes in the testimony of Irma Menkel and Janny Brandes.