@AgnesIO;
no it is the brilliance. the reaction he provokes from sjws is gold
he's not my cup of tea but hats off to him for mobilising the right on university campuses in a way nobody had before
@AgnesIO;
no it is the brilliance. the reaction he provokes from sjws is gold
he's not my cup of tea but hats off to him for mobilising the right on university campuses in a way nobody had before
Standing up to the bullied? I don't know much about him but what I've read is he is one of these bullies. Isn't this the same person who targeted one of the people who was in the new ghost buster films and was temporarily suspended from Twitter because of it.
He sounds very hypocritical if you ask me. The Kind of person who thinks free speech allows you to bully online with no consequences
I like how Dan is admitting that Milo is nothing but a troll while in the same breath pretending he's some wonderful defender of the people. Basically it's ok to bully people as long as you bully the right people
alt right and sjw are pretty much the same, provoke opposition until you can call them stupid for believing differently.
This is a bullshit story though, his presence doesn't make it newsworthy. It wasn't newsworthy before. who the fuck has pizza at a wedding anyway? ;)
@AgnesIO; i also admired the late Tony Benn immensely but his politics weren't my cup of tea
@peteyt; if they're gonna dish it out they're gonna have to take it back
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...60/143/d7a.jpg
case in point. she deserves an epic trolling for that level of nonsense
Firstly 2 wrongs don't make a right. By dishing it out they are really becoming what they hate.
And my point was about how he targeted people with what looked very much like racism. Take Anita Sarkeesian. 99 percent of what she says is stupid in my opinion and she seems to play up to a lot of things but that doesn't make it okay to send death threats and so on and actually it only adds fuel to the fire