So he was forced to defend himself after immenseman was questioning him for no reason hes being negative towards habbox?
Printable View
So he was forced to defend himself after immenseman was questioning him for no reason hes being negative towards habbox?
So basically the rule does not apply to undertaker as he didn't break it. You could also argue that it is not written in the official rules and therefore doesn't stand.
Of course it's unfair he hasn't technically broken any rules
I think he should be IPBanned, let alone banned.
To be fair, the management can do what they like. But, it looks unprofessional if they ban someone for no apparent reason
they say they have a reason but with management these days "Reason" is a term used lightly
However we will be stricter with members that are ONLY causing trouble all the time, for example by repeatedly complaining about specific members, repeatedly making complaints without good argumentation, being rude all the time, repeatedly advertising other websites and repeatedly saying they are better than this forum,
Undertaker makes posts that backs up his opinions with good arguement, he's certainly not here to ONLY cause trouble all the time. His posts tend to be interesting and contributes to the forum rather well, even if I don't always agree with him :)
Yeah. it is simply his opinion with good arguments to back them up.
yeah I agree with Jeeves, is it wrong to post negatively even if thats your beliefs and views. You cant say what you like if its going to offend someone but I dont think he ever offended anyone, seems unfair when you've got people on here who post occasional things that upset people but still carry on (not me of course :P) so I think its wrong
I think everything habbox knows about freespeech has been thrown out the window.
ROFL. Tbh that goes with the apparent new rule.
Un Ban..
If habbox ban users for not agreeing with habbox what ever happend to the say Habbox is a Guide not the Bible.
Contradictions are everywhere in the world of habbox :).
No idea. Come again? what happened to Robo?
he resigned.
so why would he want a new account to post. Srsly Jrh you make me laugh
now now ladies, play nice!
He did. He posted towards undertaker being unbanned earlier :).
At least you apologised :P
Oh I see, your the forum founder, but you dont have power. No I am not being sarcastic, but I am surprised you dont have SOME power.
He doesn't his viewpoint may be taken more seriously than others but he is a mere vip.
He was banned for a fair reason? and no voting will change that, unless of course the mods are on the users side, then MAYBE.
but i doubt making this thread will un-ban him.
He wasn't exactly banned for a "Fair" reason at all.
The temp ban was over turned and I have never been cautioned, you have no idea what your talking about.
Thanks. :)
I agree, but then again I can't disagree? :P
His power has been taken away from him because he defies what they thought. I have a lot of respect for Jrh. :)