Chelsea transfer ban

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-09-2009, 03:19 PM
Disaronno

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

saywhat? I have posted since the first page of this ******* thread, so obviously I have read it all.

Did you do not read it properly? they didn't make him breach it, Chelsea can't make him do anything, he did it of his own accord, because he wanted to go to Chelsea.

R.Madrid, didn't make him, no, but there is lots of speculation that he had made a verbal agreement/signed a pre-contract with R.Madrid a year before the transfer took place, which would make it illegal/tapping up, but will Uefa/Fifa invesitgate this? no, because clubs that aren't based in England get away with everything, remember Fifa moaning about City and Chelsea spending all that money on some players? but they say jack **** when R.Madrid go and spent £130,000,000.00 on TWO players?

Please go re-read the thread and come back when you have some basic knowledge regarding football.

i read all of the thread and all of yor posts. And i know loads about football, what i said has **** all to do with me and my knowledge of football.
03-09-2009, 03:21 PM
StefanWolves

Quote:

Originally Posted by K-Lash

i read all of the thread and all of yor posts. And i know loads about football, what i said has **** all to do with me and my knowledge of football.

And that was meant to mean... what?
03-09-2009, 03:25 PM
BoomItsClowgon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack.Lfc

What have liverpool done. Explain

Come on now lol... we all know Liverpool as well as of other English, Spainsh... and the rest of the big Clubs, are guilty of tapping up young players w/e. Most of them give the youngsters parent's a hell load of money to make thier youngster break their current contract with thier current Club.

I'm just glad it didn't happen to us.

*Time for a change of plan* :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

Yes, this is life, but it is also sport, and there is a lot of money to be win or loose ~ all clubs should treated the same, and at this moment in time there is obvious and blatant double standards being given out by Uefa/Fifa towards English clubs compared to foreign clubs.

******* disgusting.

And no, Chelsea will win the league this year, even with this ban.

Anyway, this ban will get over turned as soon as they go to the courts.

I agree and seeing with Chelsea's ageing Club. Terry, Balack, Lampard ect, they will suffer. If they don't in the upcoming months, they will do after Christmas.. It will be a huge blow to them if they appeal and it gets turned down.

That French tart needs a good kick up the backside... i can't believe no one who's in the same, or nearly in the same position as him, has not challenged him with what he's doing. Something really needs to be done about him because it's getting ridiculous.

It's going to be interesting in the next couple of months to see what will happen, will European Clubs like Madrid, Barcelona get similar punishes as what we've suffered? I doubt.
03-09-2009, 03:25 PM
Browney

Quote:

Originally Posted by lBlue

Everton went public first on the subject, why do you think it's all hush hush about them going to the FA over it all? Silly boys noticed they put it on the website.

Yeah I'm just talking about Moyes saying "the people who make the transfer decisions at this club have said no, and that is it." Then Hughes was still talking about a player he was not intitled to talk to, or about. Still, Moyes cracked. No complaints from him I bet. He got 4 million more than what the Forehead is worth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

What will UEFA and FIFA do next? Remove a Champions League spot from the Premiership? I'm guessing now, Liverpool, United and City have to be careful to see who will get the next ban from Platini, he's probably looking through all our files and history trying to find some stupid little excuse to ban us from something... :rolleyes:

Why not Arsenal? :S

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

With Sepp Blatter at his side sucking his ****.

That's a very clever trick. ;)
03-09-2009, 03:29 PM
StefanWolves

Quote:

Originally Posted by Browney

Yeah I'm just talking about Moyes saying "the people who make the transfer decisions at this club have said no, and that is it." Then Hughes was still talking about a player he was not intitled to talk to, or about. Still, Moyes cracked. No complaints from him I bet. He got 4 million more than what the Forehead is worth.

Why not Arsenal? :S

That's a very clever trick. ;)

haha i like what i did their
03-09-2009, 03:32 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Browney

Why not Arsenal? :S

Eduardo.
03-09-2009, 03:52 PM
Black_Apalachi

Quote:

Originally Posted by -WooTWooTWooT-

good song for next satdee, YOU'REEE NOT SIGNING ANYMORE.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -WooTWooTWooT-

http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k2...baDisgrace.gif

I loled at both :P. It sickens me to say this, but I actually felt sorry for Chelsea over that game.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack.Lfc

What have liverpool done. Explain

I was going to ask the same thing...

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

Come on now lol... we all know Liverpool as well as of other English, Spainsh... and the rest of the big Clubs, are guilty of tapping up young players w/e. Most of them give the youngsters parent's a hell load of money to make thier youngster break their current contract with thier current Club.

I'm just glad it didn't happen to us.

*Time for a change of plan* :P [...]

Like who..?
03-09-2009, 03:56 PM
Browney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

Eduardo.

Ah riiight. Why City though? Top five, eh?
03-09-2009, 03:56 PM
BoomItsClowgon

I have no idea.. but i'm sure they've tapped up some youngsters who are in the youth, reserves team... or maybe they just play fair.. who knows?

It's impossible to however, say no they haven't because for 1) We don't know the full story of any transfer dealing between a player - Player's Club - Agent - Family.
03-09-2009, 03:58 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Browney

Ah riiight. Why City though? Top five, eh?

The amount of money we've spent perhaps? And because we are looking to become a Champions League squad not this year but possibly next year and onwards. Its common sense for Platini to target any English side thats having success/looking for success.
03-09-2009, 04:08 PM
BoomItsClowgon

If Man City don't make Champs LG spot this season.. Automatic or Qualifiers, w/e then i would see it as a failure for the Club. Mark as spent something like £130,000,000 on players over the year?

With their squad, i don't see why they shouldn't be coming in at no lower then 4th - 6th place.
03-09-2009, 04:08 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

I have no idea.. but i'm sure they've tapped up some youngsters who are in the youth, reserves team... or maybe they just play fair.. who knows?

It's impossible to however, say no they haven't because for 1) We don't know the full story of any transfer dealing between a player - Player's Club - Agent - Family.

It's only one player, but it was one of Liverpool's best.

Robbie Fowler had the choice to go to Everton or Liverpool when he was a kid, and he was brought up supporting Everton. He didn't choose a side and whilst Everton tried there best to sign him, he chose Liverpool as they let him have time to choose a club. All Liverpool offered him was £30 a week and that was it... Everton had apparently offered him a house for his family, but his mum and dad told Robbie it was his choice and to choose the team he thought he would do best in, and that was Liverpool.
03-09-2009, 04:10 PM
CHA!NGANG

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

So, now, are Fifa/Uefa going to do the same to R.Madrid? after all it's been well publicised that a deal was in place with Ronaldo last year that he would move to Madrid during this summers transfer window.

I hate foreign *******s.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

Oh besides the fact that it was blatantly clear that R.Madrid tapped up Ronaldo?They even had a ******* agreement a year before the transfer went ahead with Ronaldo, that's blatant, but will they get a punishment? no, because they're not ENGLISH.

Read the thread.

I'm pretty sure that both Man U and Madrid had a mutural agreement Ronaldo will go to Madrid. SAF Said that he knew about it last year, so no, Madrid didn't do anything wrong with that transfer as they notified Man U last season that they want to sign Ronaldo and both teams agreed to it. It wasn't a case of Madrid and Ronaldo agreeing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

UNITED WILL WIN THE LEAUGE AGAIN!!! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Chelesea are going to suffer.. Drogba, Essien, Molouda.. all going to the African Cup Of Nations. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.

Chelsea won't win anything this season mark my words.

I feel sorry for them tbh, i know Clubs like Liverpool, Man City, Real Madrid, blah blah has done stuff like this but hey, that's life. Deal with it. :)

1) Malouda is French.
2) Chelsea will still win this season in my opinion, but not the one after and not the champions League.
3) I think that they will appeal and get it recuded or suspended as stated above.

EDIT: And Clowgon in reply to your post above, if your saying if Man City don't get into the top 4 then there a failure then that's not true at all. Most City fans (that are realistic) are aiming for a 4-7th Spot this season, and the one after to break into the top 4. I don't think they will break into the top 4 until next season when they are all gelled.
03-09-2009, 04:12 PM
Browney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

The amount of money we've spent perhaps? And because we are looking to become a Champions League squad not this year but possibly next year and onwards. Its common sense for Platini to target any English side thats having success/looking for success.

Yeah but I'm English and I'm not keen on City's spending habits. :P
03-09-2009, 04:14 PM
Black_Apalachi

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

I have no idea.. but i'm sure they've tapped up some youngsters who are in the youth, reserves team... or maybe they just play fair.. who knows?

It's impossible to however, say no they haven't because for 1) We don't know the full story of any transfer dealing between a player - Player's Club - Agent - Family.

So list every club in the world then :S.
03-09-2009, 04:16 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Browney

Yeah but I'm English and I'm not keen on City's spending habits. :P

The point is we're an English club who have spent £120M on around 12 players. Whereas Real Madrid (a Spanish club may I remind you), have spent £136M on just two players, with more ontop of that!

Now tell me whose more in the wrong here? :rolleyes: And if this is a problem with FIFA, watch City get a punishment, with Real Madrid getting away with it.
03-09-2009, 04:19 PM
CHA!NGANG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

The point is we're an English club who have spent £120M on around 12 players. Whereas Real Madrid (a Spanish club may I remind you), have spent £136M on just two players, with more ontop of that!

Now tell me whose more in the wrong here? :rolleyes: And if this is a problem with FIFA, watch City get a punishment, with Real Madrid getting away with it.

Real Madrid have done nothing wrong. I know morally there spending is wrong, and lots of people disagree with it, but there is no rule saying they can't do it. Chelsea aren't being punished for spending, it was breaking a contract between a player and his club.
03-09-2009, 04:20 PM
Browney

And has Real Madrid been punished? "NO!!!1" I hear you cry. But have you. No, I didn't think so. Stop huffing.
03-09-2009, 04:26 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG

Real Madrid have done nothing wrong. I know morally there spending is wrong, and lots of people disagree with it, but there is no rule saying they can't do it. Chelsea aren't being punished for spending, it was breaking a contract between a player and his club.

If you read my past comments in this thread, you will realise how I am saying they will find an excuse for the bigger clubs to have some punishment like Arsenal and Chelsea have recieved in the last week. Browney wanted to know why City could get dragged in, and I said it could be something as stupid as us spending a lot of money, I'm not saying this could be a reason we could get a stupid ban, it could be anything. And I do know what Chelsea did? Don't have to re-explain something to me thank you very much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Browney

And has Real Madrid been punished? "NO!!!1" I hear you cry. But have you. No, I didn't think so. Stop huffing.

Stop huffing? Your the one that asked me to explain why I said City could be dragged for some silly ban like Chelsea and Arsenal have recieved?...
03-09-2009, 04:26 PM
BoomItsClowgon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

It's only one player, but it was one of Liverpool's best.

Robbie Fowler had the choice to go to Everton or Liverpool when he was a kid, and he was brought up supporting Everton. He didn't choose a side and whilst Everton tried there best to sign him, he chose Liverpool as they let him have time to choose a club. All Liverpool offered him was £30 a week and that was it... Everton had apparently offered him a house for his family, but his mum and dad told Robbie it was his choice and to choose the team he thought he would do best in, and that was Liverpool.

LOL. With what you said there.. i can't see where Liverpool have gone wrong with the signing of Robbie. :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG

I'm pretty sure that both Man U and Madrid had a mutural agreement Ronaldo will go to Madrid. SAF Said that he knew about it last year, so no, Madrid didn't do anything wrong with that transfer as they notified Man U last season that they want to sign Ronaldo and both teams agreed to it. It wasn't a case of Madrid and Ronaldo agreeing.

1) Malouda is French.
2) Chelsea will still win this season in my opinion, but not the one after and not the champions League.
3) I think that they will appeal and get it recuded or suspended as stated above.

EDIT: And Clowgon in reply to your post above, if your saying if Man City don't get into the top 4 then there a failure then that's not true at all. Most City fans (that are realistic) are aiming for a 4-7th Spot this season, and the one after to break into the top 4. I don't think they will break into the top 4 until next season when they are all gelled.

Ok fair enough.

To the Man City Point... With their current Squad... You have Robinho, Adye, Santa Cruz, Given, a Few good players sitting in Midfield as well as a good group of defenders... I can't see why City can NOT get into the Champions League this season..

Compared to last season, their team is much stronger.

Where did they finish last season? Was it 6th? But ye your right they should be aiming for at least 4th - 7 spot this season.

Any lower, for me, i would have to class that as a failure.

EDIT: and Robald how can i name all the teams LOL?

Sorry if i spelt your name wrong.
03-09-2009, 04:27 PM
Rock

Biggest load of crap ever. Our club will pretty much be ruined for next year nd possibly this year. Fifa/Uefa are determined to ruin English football. The Eduardo ban was a disgrace and so is this.
03-09-2009, 04:31 PM
Browney

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

huffing? Your the one that asked me to explain why I said City could be dragged for some silly ban like Chelsea and Arsenal have recieved?...

I asked you, why you considered your club to be in the same sentence amongst the biggest and the best of English club football. You replied that it's because you spend alot and people don't like you. Oh boo-hoo. You get to be the best club in English football by the year 2012 and you complain that some french **** doesn't like you.
03-09-2009, 04:32 PM
Rock

We premier league supporters need to unite against Fifa instead of tear chunks out of eachother :P
03-09-2009, 04:35 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

LOL. With what you said there.. i can't see where Liverpool have gone wrong with the signing of Robbie. :P

To the Man City Point... With their current Squad... You have Robinho, Adye, Santa Cruz, Given, a Few good players sitting in Midfield as well as a good group of defenders... I can't see why City can NOT get into the Champions League this season..

Compared to last season, their team is much stronger.

Where did they finish last season? Was it 6th? But ye your right they should be aiming for at least 4th - 7 spot this season.

Any lower, for me, i would have to class that as a failure.

EDIT: and Robald how can i name all the teams LOL?

Sorry if i spelt your name wrong.

Well I'm sure you we're accusing Liverpool of giving money to parents to get players, and I gave you the example of one of their best young signings, and how he wasn't given a lot of money to sign or anything.

City will finish at best 6th I think. If City don't get 4th-6th spot its because it simple. 'Its Manchester City' absolutely anything can happen at City, and its not often that its a good thing lol.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rock

Biggest load of crap ever. Our club will pretty much be ruined for next year nd possibly this year. Fifa/Uefa are determined to ruin English football. The Eduardo ban was a disgrace and so is this.

Don't worry, Chelsea will overturn the ban and will probably only recieve a ban for the January transfer window which won't really affect your squad.
03-09-2009, 04:35 PM
BoomItsClowgon

Sends out a clear message to those who don't abide by the rules...

All this talk about Machelda and so, we could of got the same thing..

I'm just shocked really, if they don't get it over turned then I'll be even more shocked.

I think Chelsea will be okish, their squad is fine but a few of the players are going off to the African Cup Of Nations... I'm looking at the fixtures between then and they are fixtures where Chelsea should be winning with or without the players going off the the nations.
03-09-2009, 04:39 PM
StefanWolves

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

Well I'm sure you we're accusing Liverpool of giving money to parents to get players, and I gave you the example of one of their best young signings, and how he wasn't given a lot of money to sign or anything.

City will finish at best 6th I think. If City don't get 4th-6th spot its because it simple. 'Its Manchester City' absolutely anything can happen at City, and its not often that its a good thing lol.

Don't worry, Chelsea will overturn the ban and will probably only recieve a ban for the January transfer window which won't really affect your squad.

this.

@rock; I agree and disagree, this 'ban' that Fifa have given out is wrong, however, Eduardos was completely fair.
03-09-2009, 04:39 PM
Rock

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

Don't worry, Chelsea will overturn the ban and will probably only recieve a ban for the January transfer window which won't really affect your squad.

Its still ridiculous! Fifa are using the same lame accusation but changing the words to make it seem worse.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

Sends out a clear message to those who don't abide by the rules...

All this talk about Machelda and so, we could of got the same thing..

I'm just shocked really, if they don't get it over turned then I'll be even more shocked.

I think Chelsea will be okish, their squad is fine but a few of the players are going off to the African Cup Of Nations... I'm looking at the fixtures between then and they are fixtures where Chelsea should be winning with or without the players going off the the nations.

They need to buy more strikers.

Does anyone know if Chelsea are still able to buy any players this window with or without the ban?
03-09-2009, 04:39 PM
CHA!NGANG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

If you read my past comments in this thread, you will realise how I am saying they will find an excuse for the bigger clubs to have some punishment like Arsenal and Chelsea have recieved in the last week. Browney wanted to know why City could get dragged in, and I said it could be something as stupid as us spending a lot of money, I'm not saying this could be a reason we could get a stupid ban, it could be anything. And I do know what Chelsea did? Don't have to re-explain something to me thank you very much.

Stop huffing? Your the one that asked me to explain why I said City could be dragged for some silly ban like Chelsea and Arsenal have recieved?...

I wasn't quoting you as such, more everyone that has said why hasn't Madrid been punished but your post was the last one to mention Madrid :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

LOL. With what you said there.. i can't see where Liverpool have gone wrong with the signing of Robbie. :P

Ok fair enough.

To the Man City Point... With their current Squad... You have Robinho, Adye, Santa Cruz, Given, a Few good players sitting in Midfield as well as a good group of defenders... I can't see why City can NOT get into the Champions League this season..

Compared to last season, their team is much stronger.

Where did they finish last season? Was it 6th? But ye your right they should be aiming for at least 4th - 7 spot this season.

Any lower, for me, i would have to class that as a failure.

EDIT: and Robald how can i name all the teams LOL?

Sorry if i spelt your name wrong.

City have the squad to break into the top 4.

Given, Richards, Toure, Lescott, Bridge, SWP, De Jong, Barry, Robinho, Tevez, Adebayor.

That squad on paper could compete with any top 4 side but they need time to gell. Also, I highly doubt Adebayor's form will continue. He normally gets lazy overtime, and although he is now excited with being with a new club next season that may fade, also he is gone for the African Cup but you have enough to fill his place.

Anyway, Chelsea will suffer next season quite a lot, especially if Ballack retires and if they get injuries. If the African Cup was next season, they would truly be in trouble but they will in my opinion win this season, and come third next season.

Also, there are other effects of not having Transfers. The fans normally get excited by transfers and that gives the players and the club a boost, and also the players themselves get boosts from new players and without these, Chelsea might have less encouragement next season if that makes sence.

Oh, and if they were tracking someone like Aguero or Pato, then they might be snapped up this season or in July and Chelsea could miss out.
03-09-2009, 04:41 PM
Rock

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

this.

@rock; I agree and disagree, this 'ban' that Fifa have given out is wrong, however, Eduardos was completely fair.

I think the Eduardo thing would have been fine with a 1 game ban. But the problem is that if this was in the middle of the game and the pen hadn't been given Eduardo would have just gotten a yellow card.
03-09-2009, 04:42 PM
CHA!NGANG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rock

Its still ridiculous! Fifa are using the same lame accusation but changing the words to make it seem worse.

They need to buy more strikers.

Does anyone know if Chelsea are still able to buy any players this window with or without the ban?

This window is shut :S
03-09-2009, 04:43 PM
StefanWolves

Fact is, this ban effects Chelses FC as a trading business also, by stopping Chelsea from making transfers will obviously affect new shirt sales, and fan bases around the world, i.e. if Chelsea bought someone from China (which they can't do now), this ban would further effect Chelsea football club as well as a business because if a player from Chelsea, i.e. Ballack retires, and they get many injuries, it could effect weather they make it into the top four, and if they don't then that means they loose a hell of a lot of money.

If Chelsea take this ban to court then I really do not see how this 'ban' would stand up, Fifa aren't like the government, they shouldn't be aloud to implement bans like this, remember when they were trying to push through the "6 English players and 5 foreign" bullcrap? the EU union soon kicked that one out, and I expect this to be aswell.
03-09-2009, 04:43 PM
Rock

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG

This window is shut :S

LOL my heads still in August sorry carry on.
03-09-2009, 04:44 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Browney

I asked you, why you considered your club to be in the same sentence amongst the biggest and the best of English club football. You replied that it's because you spend alot and people don't like you. Oh boo-hoo. You get to be the best club in English football by the year 2012 and you complain that some french **** doesn't like you.

Quote me saying that. :rolleyes:

I said it could be the money we've spent, and it could also be because we're looking at becoming a Champions League team in 2/3 years time. Do you have a time machine telling me we'll be the best English club in 2012? I'm not complaining about Platini because of City's sake, I'm complaining because I'm sick of him being against English football clubs overall. If he's made silly bans for Chelsea and Arsenal, whats stopping him creating bans for clubs like Liverpool, United and City? I don't think you would be too happy if you found out that Sunderland were in the same position as Chelsea, because I know I wouldn't be happy like many other people.
03-09-2009, 05:08 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

this.

@rock; I agree and disagree, this 'ban' that Fifa have given out is wrong, however, Eduardos was completely fair.

Erm, what player have City forced a player to cancel his contract with?

Also I was on about City when they play on the pitch. :rolleyes: Things like when we we're beating West Brom 1-0 and as Dunne ran back to defend a counter attack in the final minute, the ball accidentally bounced of the back of his foot from the lob, and it lobbed are keeper making the game a draw lmao.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG

I wasn't quoting you as such, more everyone that has said why hasn't Madrid been punished but your post was the last one to mention Madrid :P

Ah OK, sorry then. lol
03-09-2009, 05:09 PM
lBlue

So then *Removed* comments?

Quote:

Manchester United have completed the signing of French starlet Paul Pogba, much to Le Havre's dismay.
The Red Devils have beaten Premier League rivals Arsenal to the 16-year-old's signature, but the deal has caused uproar with his former employers.
Le Havre http://static.lingospot.com/spot/image/spacer.gif are furious at seeing one of their top talents snatched from under their noses by a European superpower.
The Ligue 2 outfit believed they had an agreement with Pogba which would see him stay in France until at least the end of the 2009/10 campaign.
However, that bond has been broken and the French outfit have called on the football authorities to act in order to prevent similar situations arising in the future.
Indignation

"Le Havre want to express their indignation at the actions of Manchester United http://static.lingospot.com/spot/image/spacer.gif officials and their pursuit of Paul Pogba," read a statement on the club's official website.
"Paul Pogba, his parents and Le Havre were bound to a contract called a 'non-solicitation agreement' from autumn 2006.
"At the end of that contract, the three parties agreed to sign a trainee contract when the player matched certain age and scholarship criteria, taking him through to the end of the 2009/10 season.
"However, the player and his parents have refused to fulfil the agreement because Manchester United have offered big money to the parents to get their son to England.
"While a lot of voices have started to be heard coming out of the EU, governments, Fifa and Uefa against 'minor slave trade', Manchester United have not hesitated to uproot a 16-year-old kid."

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,195...465427,00.html

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not make inappropriate comments about other members. Thanks
03-09-2009, 05:14 PM
StefanWolves

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

Erm, what player have City forced a player to cancel his contract with?

Also I was on about City when they play on the pitch. :rolleyes: Things like when we we're beating West Brom 1-0 and as Dunne ran back to defend a counter attack in the final minute, the ball accidentally bounced of the back of his foot from the lob, and it lobbed are keeper making the game a draw lmao.

Ah OK, sorry then. lol

I wasn't aiming that post at you?
03-09-2009, 05:16 PM
BoomItsClowgon

Quote:

Originally Posted by lBlue

So then Clowngon, comments?

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,195...465427,00.html

So what's your ******** point?

And don't call me "Clowngon"

One person has already got banned for saying this, would you like to be the next one? ***** :rolleyes:

Edited by Hecktix (Forum Moderator): Please do not make rude and inappropriate remarks.
03-09-2009, 05:24 PM
-WooTWooTWooT-

*Removed*

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not make inappropriate comments. Thanks
03-09-2009, 05:24 PM
Flamedragon3

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWolf

this.

@rock; I agree and disagree, this 'ban' that Fifa have given out is wrong, however, Eduardos was completely fair.

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Sorry I made an error and merged wrong post. Apologies.
03-09-2009, 05:34 PM
StefanWolves

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomItsClowgon

So what's your ******** point?

And don't call me "Clowngon"

One person has already got banned for saying this, would you like to be the next one? ***** :rolleyes:

*Removed*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamedragon3

Well when I said how anything silly could happen at City you said 'this' which gave me the impression you meant 'this - what has just happened to Chelsea'

I dunno if I misread that. If I have I'm sorry, but can you explain what you meant by 'this'?

It meant I agree with this. :P

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not make inappropriate comments. Thanks.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Parts of this site powered by vBulletin Mods & Addons from DragonByte® Technologies Ltd. (Details)
Copyright © 2004 - | Habboxforum.com
Habbox is not affiliated with, endorsed, sponsored, or specifically approved by Sulake Corporation Oy or its affiliates. Habbox may use the trademarks and other intellectual property of Habbo, which is permitted under the Habbo fansite policy.