*Removed*
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not be rude or target other members in this way.
Printable View
*Removed*
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not be rude or target other members in this way.
i dunno if it was purposely posted, but, i have thought it before. But still, the money youve made off of it doesnt mean that people particularly like the images do they? i mean people have posted in here with it and they have it, yet they would prefer new images? its a matter of making the forum look nicer, or more horrible with the already large amount of images in the user bit
i think people did complain but only because they're big on "members online" at bottom of the forum, i just got used to it though.
the current ones look fine to me they're good size next to the names, ones you posted are too small
The flags are not being changed. Nice images and all that but there is no point changing them now, maybe for the semi-finals but at the moment it isn't needed.
lets all point to this thread.. http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=650888
no im saying that people clearly prefer different ones as the current ones arent nice to look at. and its clear that its JUST management (bar jen but she doesnt count) that doesnt want to change. mainly cus its you who has to change it. all you have to do is upload the images on top of the current ones.. maybe resize to the same but still..
Surely if this was an issue when it was announced (around 8 or more days ago) then maybe it would of been changed back then. The only time new flags was mentioned is when Graham posted a message on my profile, if he wanted it to be a serious change then a feedback thread could of been made. Everyone who has bought the WC donator so far doesn't seem to have a problem with it?
Oh I see a lazy thing is it. Then all the things we have done in the past doesn't get counted for? If we wanted it and liked the change then it would of been done if everyone agreed and what not. I suppose all the things we are planning for next month and so on shouldn't be done because we are lazy! Yes?
It's just members nitpicking, interestingly no members who have bought the donator want the change.
The change isn't going to happen, you can hardly say we say no to everything because we don't - we say yes to a hell of a lot of things, however it's not the members that run HabboxForum and it's not always Habbox Forums interests that the members have at heart.
I don't really care if its changed or not, but if members want it and it does no harm, then why not?
You say its not been suggested before, but that's because no one could really be bothered. Most new ideas have never been suggested before - but people only realise when they see the new idea.
No one complained about double post rule - but when I suggested the auto merge idea, people liked it.
---------- Post added 18-06-2010 at 11:05 PM ----------
I personally do think its ugly that's why I didn't buy it. I prefer new colours hence I buy them instead. My old account which got banned had like 3 new colours which hadn't even been used, but I never buy ones with a prefix or an icon as I personally hate them.
NO. dont even dare start throwing that at us. It happens every time. something is posted in feedback and its a idea that everyone likes, and management jst reply saying 'no sorry, its not happening'. Its exactly like the MOTM all over again, but this is a lot easier to rectify.
Maybe thats because they either havent seen it, or cant be bothered to even read the thread.
you never said yes to youtube embedding all the times it was suggested, and you never said yes to awards. Youve implemented a useless system. you have to navigate away from apage, and click 3 times to get to where you want to be. Pointless. youtube embedding came as a feature on vB4 and if it hadnt been upgraded, i fear it wouldnt have been
At first I did think the flags were quite ugleh and big, just taken a bit of getting used too I suppose. They have grown on me now.
I do quite like those smaller flags as they do look a little nicer, so I think it's a nice suggestion. But I think to start changing them at this point might backfire with other people saying they liked the old ones, etc. I dunno, I kind of agree with Myke about the poll thing and I do get what you are all saying but yeah... just my input. Democracy and all that.
runs away
oh and I only bought it because I like the orange colour and not so much because of the flags >.>
continues to run
They changed the purple colour just now from a much nicer one I prefered the old one :(
it doesnt matter, there is a difference between having an image, and a colour. Im sorry but even if you dont want to change it, i stll think a vote would clarify a few things of what members want. heck, it could even back your point up. But if you do, do not put a biased poll.
We aren't saying no to everything. To be honest, we have given the members a lot of say regarding a lot of things that could of changed and what not. We have had polls on the following: Awards for past MOTM, New User Rank bars, new user rank system and so on. We have given you the choice of what could happen via polls before. Just because we said no to this, doesn't mean we will say no to everything and anything!
Funny that this should be created by a member with an obvious axe to grind, given the thread that was recently closed. Why has this suddenly became an issue? Because you lot were pissed off with a totally separate issue and wanted to moan about something else.
Lets be clear here. HxF is not a democracy. Hell yeah we love to hear the opinion of the community, and there is absolutely no way anyone could deny we haven't taken notice of member feedback and appropriately implemented policy that the majority of our members have wanted. This, however, seems to me to be an attempt of those members who are annoyed at a previous thread to try and stir issues that aren't at all that pressing.
The flags are just fine. I am not going to sit here and pretend they are the most amazing graphics Habbox Forum have ever produced, but it doesn't seem to be much of a problem to those who have purchased the donator and haven't expressed any issue with the flags to this point. Why should we change something that, thus far, appears to be just fine apart from those who are obviously intending to cause drama or controversy.
Show us that it's an overriding and pressing issue, and we'll be more than willing to change it.
I've just looked through the feedback forum and it seems that 3/5 times this week we've said yes.
Things we've said yes to this week:
- Looking into making changes to the trading section forums/desscriptions (suggested by kk.)
- Birthdays at the bottom of the forum - Suggested by Rozi
- MOTM and Sunday Updates awards to previous winners ~ Suggested by multiple members
- Lower the amount of people that need to be rep'd before you can rep again ~ Suggested by Black_Apalachi (we even agreed on a number with members)
- Asked about the promotion of Groups/Arcade - being looked into.
- Adding an option to change forum width.
Which is pretty impressive considering I've been restricted on time and been stupidly busy with exams, admittedly these changes haven't happened yet, but that's simply because I can barely find time to breathe during these A2 exams, come thursday they'll be flying in.
But we clearly don't say no to "most things" :P
Tbh they don't always say no, so mgmt are right there.
But the fact that most people with WC VIP never post in this section shows they don't care about any feedback in general tbh :P So even if they hated it, they wouldn't post as they never seen to anyway. Like I said, people didnt moan about double post till I suggested the merge addon.
no but its still basically the same. i dont often come into the feedback forum but when i do and i see a reasonably good idea or suggestion, which most members agree with, i just see you two coming along saying 'no, not happening'. like i said earlier, it happened with te MOTM award, and this thread. which just happen to be the two threads ive been in lol. as well as youtube embedding and awards.
read above to first part. i didnt realise that the MOTM had actually been put to a poll tbqh, but it doesnt negate the fact that it should have been done in the first place. What about the countless threads on youtube embedding, awards, etc etc. i dont know, it just seems small things like this are just ignored which would make theforum look a whole lot nicer.
ive gone on and on about how it looks hideous with all the different images and when im next on my computer with photoshop, ill do a mockup wit hwo the forum should look, and prove to you that the current one is stupid..
---------- Post added 18-06-2010 at 11:36 PM ----------
also:
- Looking into making changes to the trading section forums/desscriptions (suggested by kk.)
is hardly a feature -_- its a correction lol. and as i said in that thread, it didnt even bother me.
I don't think you can blame us for previous management saying no to youtube embedding.
It's here now and we were given the option to have it turned off when we changed to vB4, and we opted not to.
Again, you can't blame us for previous management saying no to the awards system, now we're in charge it's here.
Like I have said, I ain't too bothered as I hate images in names anyway so I would rather they didn't exist. Just seemed majority who posted wanted it and I refer back to my auto merge idea. No one complained till I posted the idea and then everyone wanted it. Same for WC predictions.
I asked for peoples suggestions, maybe you read you might of seen that, im not ******* moaning about anything. Im also not the main person fighting for it, i simply asked people what they though.
I suggested it to matt and oli a good while ago (not to you, didnt see a need to show you cause you only deal with staff) but didn't only did it on msn/vm. I was given the idea by another member tonight so i decided to post a thread. By i see im not allowed an opinion and whenever i have one its considered moaning so thread closed :)
You all seem to be acting like children @ mgmt
ironic that ou call members immature