Avatar

Sorry thought you meant Golden Globes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kk.

Because even though the visuals made the film, it was still entertaining and personally was probably one of the better films nominated. not only that but when he starts mouthing off on the forum, like im just going to ignore it..

Surely you could say the same to adam then..

---

Well this whole argument started with the disagreement over whether or not the visuals were what made the film good. Now you're agreeing with it so I don't see what the point of the argument was in the first place and it just emphasises the fact that Adam knows what he's talking about and despite your protests, you have essentially just proven he is right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sergio

Well this whole argument started with the disagreement over whether or not the visuals were what made the film good. Now you're agreeing with it so I don't see what the point of the argument was in the first place and it just emphasises the fact that Adam knows what he's talking about and despite your protests, you have essentially just proven he is right.

---

I believe he means that the visuals helped to make it a good film but weren't the sole reason that it was good which is the viewpoint I and most of my friends hold. In regards to Adam, just because he says it's a fact it doesn't make it so.

At the end of a day it should not be critics or film makers who judge a film but the population itself and judging by both the Box office numbers and IMDB ratings it is very high.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Voiceover.

i just went with something that rhymed it was mainly because you've said it loads in this thread LOL.

---

Well it's because this thread is like the Alamo! Or was, until Misawa posse arrived.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sergio

Sorry thought you meant Golden Globes.



Well this whole argument started with the disagreement over whether or not the visuals were what made the film good. Now you're agreeing with it so I don't see what the point of the argument was in the first place and it just emphasises the fact that Adam knows what he's talking about and despite your protests, you have essentially just proven he is right.

---

the whole argument was actually started when he branded the forum idiots for not believing what he was saying. The award was 'Best Motion Picture - Drama', this can be interpreted in many ways. Adam sees it as cinematography, and acting, and directing, whilst others may see it as visual effects or how entertaining it was. The visual effects made it entertaining yes, but there were other aspects of it which also contributed to the entertainment value of it.

1. Titanic - $1,842,879,955
2. Avatar - $1,745,839,686

:O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Misawa

Anyone who disagrees with Avatar being the worst nominee amongst the listed films in both winning categories is quite simply an idiot.

---

sort your life out

Even if I was James Cameron, I'd much rather Titanic remained as the highest grossing film of all time.

Lesson #1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdIIqoDakHU
Lesson #2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9uo4nOD__s
Lesson #3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-SVpZrnF34

You like Titanic better than Avatar?

Hard to say. As a kid I always associated Titanic with being a "girly" film. I know it's stupid but I guess it's mainly because I only ever heard girls talk about it and DiCaprio etc. Now that I'm older, I should probably watch it again with an open mind. Either way, I'm pretty confident it is much more worthy than Avatar.

I disagree. They are both incredibly overrated films but Titanic was no where near as groundbreaking as Avatar.