Printable View
Yes, that is true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mentor
I think I am going to refrain ffrom my first post to support my opinion.
If someone has murdered and molested other people, I believe they should be given the same punishment, besides the molesting part.
But is death a punismnt? or just an excuste for someone else to murder, once your dead your dead. your not going to cair, ist not realy a punismnt, its jsut killing
Why would America WANT to kill someone. When their dead their dead. Thats what they want. No one will be molested by that being ever again. It is really just an efficient way to help stop pedafiles.
supringly the death penlty doesnt just apply to pedofiles. all its is moe murder. if you went and shot some one, youd probly get the death penlty. but they may as well be randomlyt shhoting them, theres no diffenc in it. its just more murder, by that logic the excutier, perosn whop pshs the butten or comistiner also desrev sthe death penlty, meain a pointless cyles of death, isyt just avoded by saying thats time killing is ok. i dont think illing or murder should EVER be ok
The death penalty is not used often.
If someone goes and shoots someone, the penalty is most often a Jail Sentence, not the death penalty. It is only used when the crime that was commited wasv very bad.
in most contry shooting some is counted as very very bad, athogh i suppoe in america its happens alot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey777
I still dont get how letting everyone have a wepon maks people safer...
Anyway i still dont think killing someone can be justfied by saying thay killed, unless your going for the eye for an eye idea, in wich case teh new testint says you will be going to hell for.
Im strongly opposed to teh death penlty. Killing a defnces person is wrong in any way shape or form, self deafnec, killing can be justfided, butteh death penlty seem far mor elike being just for the hell of it
Shooting someone is very bad in any Developed country.
But how often do you see someone given the death penalty for shooting someone?
The death penalty should be used in cases like child molesting only.
If you heard about the Cecilia Zhang incident, for you Canadians, she was slaughtered by a Chinese college student. She was 9 years old!
He did not recieve the death penalty. Although part of me says he should have, and part of me not.
Most people who murder, dont do it becuse they want to. ist not realy there falt in many ways, a mental illeness can drive someoen to kill, yet ist not there falt, if they dont think there doing anything wrong, any punismnt given will seem as if its for nothing. what is need in most case is phyctric help, and posibly a palce in a mental isntution,
killing them solves nothing, it just means u kill every one that comes, up and ther wil ALWAYS be more. finding out how to cure mental illness and phyctric problems would result in the problesm being dectbale maybe even at brith, and allowing pople to love normal lifes? thats would be good. but killing what does that solve?
Not quite,Quote:
Originally Posted by Mentor
Yes, many have illnesses, which is why when in court, they tell the judge about their illness and are normally let off the hook for the most part.
But there are some sick oens that put children up for ransom for the money.
For them, I feel deserve an extreme punishment.
They may have had tromas as a child , or broght up in a way that giev them the opion and moralty that was right. if they dont veiw it as wrong, then they are proscuted bliveing they are insecnet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey777
Right and wrong are in the eyes of the beholder, a good exprssion for this idea is "one mans terrist is another mans freedom fighter"