Michael Jackson's case

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ryan

if you ask me michael jackson is one of the nicest people around

hes built a theme park in his house and he lets kids with terminal diseases come to stay with him to make thier last few days/months good

---

1. This is where he was accused to abusing the children, when he had them over to his theme park.
2. He paid off another boy back in 92' or 93' for the same charges.
In my mind- I think he's guilty, but we'll never see all the evidence that the jury sees.

And ain't it weird he always says he wants little kids around him?

he is not guilty...

i kinda reckon he is guilty!
Its his own fault even if hes not because he had this happen to him years ago and then he doesnt learn and still lets kids come around!
And someone sed tht a kid will do anything for money but...
eventually that kid will crack, he will tell someone or let somethign slip, so i kinda thing he is guilty, as if i had to keep a secret like that and i was lying and i had papparzi round my house and everything iam sure i would let something out

I agree with Reformed. To me it it just seems that hes guilty cuz they found his fingerprints and fingerprints of a kid accusing him on adult material (I wont go into detail)

If he is found guilty he would be put in one of those prison were the prisoners can leave etc etc.

I am swaying, i saw a documentry and it was kinda disturbing about him. He admitted to asking a boy to go into his bed! He may have, maybe not. Who knows apart from him :S

After watching many documentry's about him, the latest one called 'Michael Jackson's boys', on Channel 4 (UK).

I was kind of pretty sure he was guilty, but then I thought, maybe the children (pressurized by their family), is going to extremes to prove him guilty, I'm looking forward to seeing the result.
Although, I definately think it has all been exaggerated because he's so famous.
But like someone said, one boy did describe the events pretty vividly, and it was hard to imagine that he made it up.
So quite frankly I do not know what the hell to believe.

if it wanst true he woulnt have tryed to cover it up.
Plus under presuse children are likly to slip up, so i DO think hes guilty.

i perosnly think its been under esagrated becuse hes famos. hes a pediofile, and deserves a long prison sentecae, being famos does not mean he can get away with it

Of course it doesn't, it's never been that way, I do think he's guilty, but you never know, until he's proven.