Printable View
Yes I have.
But you'd be getting double the amount of attention from that gender of parent thus causing a unbalanced "touch"
If there's one mother, the boy will learn to cope on his own and most Single parent familys usually have dads until their teenage years.
No because they will be bullied and have terrible childhoods.
I think they can if they can prove that they will give the child a good quality of life. If the child is bullied, who really is to blame? No one, the only person at fault is the moronic bully.
No, reason is that the child might grow up gay, which it may not want to be but is taught to be gay. If you understand what I mean. Plus they'd probably be bullied, which isn't right.
Also please note: I am not a homophobic and I don't have anything against gays. :)
And so what if the child grows up to be gay? As long as that child is happy, what's stopping them? As stated, if they are bullied, it is the bully who has social problems, not the gay child. If he wants to be straight, he will be. I really don't see how a parents influence would make a child forcefully be a type of sexuality, it's stupid thinking that "/ They would act gay, but be straight. Most people do till they reach adulthood and possibly "come out."Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG-BAD-BOSS
Also people are seeing black and white. You can learn to cook from your father and learn to be kind from both. It isn't all cooking and kindness with mothers, and who is to say fathers will be mean :rolleyes:
But maybe they'd be happier being straight, maybe the parents wont give them a choice.
I'm not going to argue with gommeinc you'll win. *drops guns*
edit: sorry for double post delete pls comp lagged
They may well be happier straight, but then again someone who is straight maybe happier being gay, but that's if you can turn on and off a sexuality, this is ignoring bisexuals.Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG-BAD-BOSS
yeeeaahhh
AgreedQuote:
Originally Posted by Cheekykarl