I agree slightly;
I mean if a super moderator thought that the moderation overall was bad, and posted a comment saying it was crap... I have a feeling that something would be done...
Printable View
I agree slightly;
I mean if a super moderator thought that the moderation overall was bad, and posted a comment saying it was crap... I have a feeling that something would be done...
As long they are not the admins or whatever, I think they should be given a choice to vote. Imagine a president voting for himself :P As long they are given equal rights as a voting as compared to a normal member, i think this is ok.
If the moderation really is slow to respond then I'm sure that 10 moderators won't really swing the difference that much. We work to create a good environment for our staff as well as our members. And staff are honest, sometimes they may "disagree with popular opinion" because they see the other side that nobody else cares to listen to, but if something is genuinely wrong 90% of staff who think its wrong would vote accordingly.
That's a fair concern but I don't think there's any way to bar voting by Join Date, and I don't think the star groups are a good way to decide as a high post count is not necessarily synonymous with an understanding of how things work at Habbox, or an understanding of the community even.