Proving haters wrong...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeatHost

Not really, its basic GCSE maths it took less than a minuite. He says this thread is proving haters wrong when it clearly isnt as a 35'' tv is nothing like a 27'' tv.

---

It's a 32" i just placed my Xbox next to my 32" tv and it measures up the same. Get over it your wrong.

Nice set up though.

He didnt say it was 32'' he said it was 35''

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GearsOfWar

How is this proveing us wrong? This isn't the TV you posted in your thread, it's a completely different one, and you've had that poster for two years? Well done.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeatHost

No its not?!?!?!?!

Look at the size of the 360 and the TV. The 360 is about as tall as the TV screen and the TV screen is about twice as long as its height. Ill work out its appoximate dimensions.

Pythagoras theorem
(12.15x12.5)+(24.3x24.3)
156.25+590.49
=746.74
Root 746.74=27.326

So its around 27' nowhere near 35', lying isnt cool.

---

Ahahaha thread winners

I just remeasured it useing objects of the same depth, no way is it 32''

Proof
I alinged the DVD boxes shown in the picture along the screen overlapping them slightly so if anything the screen size I give will be bigger than his. I used the DVD boxes because as the bottom picture shows they are at the exact same depth as the TV.
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/4582/tvix2.png
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/458...d970a03def.jpg

Its 25 boxes by 45 boxes or 35cm by 63cm. Now this time rather than using my own method I decided to use an online calculator to prove it works.
http://www.analyzemath.com/Geometry_...rectangle.html

Enter in 35x63 and you will find the Diagonal of the TV (Which he claimed to be 35'' then 32'') around 72.06941. We can then use a CM to Inches calculator (http://www.manuelsweb.com/in_cm.htm) and we come out with 28.4 in. It is less than 28.4 in because I delibratly overlapped the DVD cases to give the maximum possible size the TV could be. If you would like to try this yourself then please feel free you will only come out with the same result I did.

I dont care if you say Im sad, the first one took less than a min and this way took around 4-5 mins which only took longer because Im explaining why it isnt 32''.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeatHost

I just remeasured it useing objects of the same depth, no way is it 32''

Proof
I alinged the DVD boxes shown in the picture along the screen overlapping them slightly so if anything the screen size I give will be bigger than his. I used the DVD boxes because as the bottom picture shows they are at the exact same depth as the TV.
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/4582/tvix2.png
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/458...d970a03def.jpg

Its 25 boxes by 45 boxes or 35cm by 63cm. Now this time rather than using my own method I decided to use an online calculator to prove it works.
http://www.analyzemath.com/Geometry_...rectangle.html

Enter in 35x63 and you will find the Diagonal of the TV (Which he claimed to be 35'' then 32'') around 72.06941. We can then use a CM to Inches calculator (http://www.manuelsweb.com/in_cm.htm) and we come out with 28.4 in. It is less than 28.4 in because I delibratly overlapped the DVD cases to give the maximum possible size the TV could be. If you would like to try this yourself then please feel free you will only come out with the same result I did.

I dont care if you say Im sad, the first one took less than a min and this way took around 4-5 mins which only took longer because Im explaining why it isnt 32''.

---

Whats wrong with you...?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeatHost

I just remeasured it useing objects of the same depth, no way is it 32''

Proof
I alinged the DVD boxes shown in the picture along the screen overlapping them slightly so if anything the screen size I give will be bigger than his. I used the DVD boxes because as the bottom picture shows they are at the exact same depth as the TV.
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/4582/tvix2.png
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/458...d970a03def.jpg

Its 25 boxes by 45 boxes or 35cm by 63cm. Now this time rather than using my own method I decided to use an online calculator to prove it works.
http://www.analyzemath.com/Geometry_...rectangle.html

Enter in 35x63 and you will find the Diagonal of the TV (Which he claimed to be 35'' then 32'') around 72.06941. We can then use a CM to Inches calculator (http://www.manuelsweb.com/in_cm.htm) and we come out with 28.4 in. It is less than 28.4 in because I delibratly overlapped the DVD cases to give the maximum possible size the TV could be. If you would like to try this yourself then please feel free you will only come out with the same result I did.

I dont care if you say Im sad, the first one took less than a min and this way took around 4-5 mins which only took longer because Im explaining why it isnt 32''.

---

It's not the fact that you're doing the math...

it's the fact WHY you're doing the math... WHY do you care about something so petty?

His thread is trying to prove how awesome he is, its merely him boasting about it when actually hes just lying. Im just disproving it.

Yeah but why do you care about him boasting? If he wants to boast about 'how awesome he is' let him :S it's not causing anyone any harm atall...

you're TRYING to disprove him...

when really what you're doing is PROVING that you have too much time on your hands.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeatHost

His thread is trying to prove how awesome he is, its merely him boasting about it when actually hes just lying. Im just disproving it.

---

Hardly boasting... Everyone can buy a 32" Samsung, heck you can get a 42" for £999 with a free blu-ray player. And Xbox 360s are as common as pigeons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeatHost

I just remeasured it useing objects of the same depth, no way is it 32''

Proof
I alinged the DVD boxes shown in the picture along the screen overlapping them slightly so if anything the screen size I give will be bigger than his. I used the DVD boxes because as the bottom picture shows they are at the exact same depth as the TV.
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/4582/tvix2.png
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/458...d970a03def.jpg

Its 25 boxes by 45 boxes or 35cm by 63cm. Now this time rather than using my own method I decided to use an online calculator to prove it works.
http://www.analyzemath.com/Geometry_...rectangle.html

Enter in 35x63 and you will find the Diagonal of the TV (Which he claimed to be 35'' then 32'') around 72.06941. We can then use a CM to Inches calculator (http://www.manuelsweb.com/in_cm.htm) and we come out with 28.4 in. It is less than 28.4 in because I delibratly overlapped the DVD cases to give the maximum possible size the TV could be. If you would like to try this yourself then please feel free you will only come out with the same result I did.

I dont care if you say Im sad, the first one took less than a min and this way took around 4-5 mins which only took longer because Im explaining why it isnt 32''.

---

Sort yourself out man, geez.