how do you know that the child wont go in the army?
Printable View
A child dying in a murder. I have plenty of friends that are in the army etc but that is part of signing up. To server and protect by force and possibilities of putting your life in danger.
If you asked which is more significant id say the soldiers as they risk their lives for their country.
You can't really say 'Which is more important', thats just using there lifes as statistics or as points in a debate, each life is special and loss of any is just as important as the one before, or the million after.
Both are as important as each other. You cannot say one persons death is more important than another.
Yea, both are as important, but I would feel for the child most.
Well i would say troop in iraq because you didnt state what the child was or had done if a troop gets killed thats one more small step to loosing the war
anyway yeh the Kid shouldnt die because its not their fault they have been put in that situation however the soldier has chosen to put themselves in that position.
what about if the guy in iraq dies, then the kid grows up and joins the army :rolleyes:
child.
the soldier however signed up knowing he could die. though i suppose any death is bad
the soldier... he signed up and made the choice, but the child hasnt had any life yet
I think a child being murdered is more drastic,
As A, the child is defenceless and anyone being murdered is brutal.
B, The child could grow up to do great things, such as discover a cure for cancer!
Also, looking on the soldiers side, he is doing his job, not getting killed, but hes fighting for his country, and he will be ready for anything, and die a hero, whereas the child hasnt even had the chance.
IMO.