How does this VIP Rule work exactly?

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

16-01-2009, 06:51 AM
Agnostic Bear

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvrspk4

The idea is that a colored name for donation is simply "recognizing" them for donating and allowing people who donated to be "recognized" by other forum members.

Allow them to be "recognized" by a larger avatar and "recognized" by a nice profile.

Playing on words is the way to get around pretty much anything.
16-01-2009, 07:19 AM
nvrspk4

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Allow them to be "recognized" by a larger avatar and "recognized" by a nice profile.

Playing on words is the way to get around pretty much anything.

Problem is that Sulake enforces the spirit of the rule - not the word of the rule. Either they will reject our definition or change theirs, they have the ability to make the rules however they want since they have the magic copyright.
16-01-2009, 08:26 AM
Yonder

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvrspk4

The idea is that a colored name for donation is simply "recognizing" them for donating and allowing people who donated to be "recognized" by other forum members.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Allow them to be "recognized" by a larger avatar and "recognized" by a nice profile.

Playing on words is the way to get around pretty much anything.

Exactly what i was going to say so if they make the rules and they are saying recognition we are allowed to use then why cant we call bigger avvys, sigs, viewing rep etc recognition for donating. I totally agree with Jewish Bear they are playing and enforcing a flawed rule, exploit it in my opinion.
17-01-2009, 01:45 AM
leah

Sulake have made a pathetic rule with may flaws in it, own them nvr!
17-01-2009, 01:31 PM
UrbanRyan

Its a stupid rule in the first place. God knows why they made it.
17-01-2009, 01:41 PM
GommeInc

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvrspk4

The idea is that a colored name for donation is simply "recognizing" them for donating and allowing people who donated to be "recognized" by other forum members.

Surely the other features of VIP could come under that wording too? I like how are so bad an properly enforcing rules. They don't stick to the script, they make it up as they go along.

Habbo are such a lame company now :/
17-01-2009, 01:53 PM
leah

Quote:

Originally Posted by GommeInc

Surely the other features of VIP could come under that wording too? I like how are so bad an properly enforcing rules. They don't stick to the script, they make it up as they go along.

Habbo are such a lame company now :/

we shoud sue them tbh
18-01-2009, 02:54 AM
nvrspk4

Quote:

Originally Posted by GommeInc

Surely the other features of VIP could come under that wording too? I like how are so bad an properly enforcing rules. They don't stick to the script, they make it up as they go along.

Habbo are such a lame company now :/

Exactly, it could, however they say anything which provides "extra features" or an "extra level of access" is unacceptable. They simply don't recognize a name color as "extra features".
18-01-2009, 05:03 AM
Yonder

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvrspk4

Exactly, it could, however they say anything which provides "extra features" or an "extra level of access" is unacceptable. They simply don't recognize a name color as "extra features".

but it is.
18-01-2009, 05:49 AM
nvrspk4

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yonder

but it is.

Ya but if we make that argument they won't say ok you can have avatars, they'll say ok you just can't have colored names.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page