Printable View
But if you don't actually tell us why you think its bad then we won't know how we can improve, so its really like slashing your own tires. You think its bad but you aren't going to tell us why so we can't do anything about it. In that case if you continue to feel its bad you only have yourself to blame for being so stubborn about giving us reasons :P
Because those that are in favour of the thread are of my opinion, thus when someone raises a point that is against my opinion, I chose to challenge it :rolleyes:.Quote:
Originally Posted by adammm
When you say something, you're usually asked to back it up if someone disagrees. If you throw out statements like that its pretty difficult for other people to accept your arguments :PQuote:
Originally Posted by adammm
If you intention was not to cause disruption by confrontation, you've probably disrupted the thread just by posting your disagreement so there are two options, one leave the thread and hold your opinion, or two air your opinion with backing :P You've done neither at this point adam :P
I was just saying I disagree with the statement made and then some idiot tries and provokes argument. Surely if I wanted to expand on my opinions I would've done so in my original post - why he couldn't grasp that I really don't know. My original post could've been left alone. If I wanted to improve the moderation or suggest ideas for imporvement then I'd post them? I content with the way it's moderated because no matter what ideas I pass along they'll be disregarded because I'm not a majority. THUS my reasons for not expanding on my original post.
While I understand your point, your post is then meant to be a free standing post and you wished for it not to be discussed. If its not meant to be discussed, it is pointless:Quote:
Originally Posted by adammm
Admittedly it says thread, that is a mistake on our part, but if you make a post in a thread then you should be expecting feedback on it. If you don't elaborate, then your post is not constructive. You are by no means required to justify having an opinion, however if you make your opinion public you are absolutely obligated to explain it.Quote:
A11. Do not post pointlessly – A pointless post has no relevance to the topic, any previous post or is meaningless (ghnrgher etc). A pointless thread either has no meaning, is something posted that is not true (e.g. false story in news and rumours) or a thread that doesn't prompt a discussion (eg. post the colour of socks you're wearing).
In which case every post agreeing with the OP's original statement is classed as pointless in your eyes as it CANNOT prompt discussion - merely agreeing and therefore it shows that you're only in favour of positive opinions on these matters and therefore disregard those that oppose it. I understand what you're saying but if someone can 'legally' post "I agree" then I can't understand why someone cannot 'legally' post "I disagree" without being obliged to provide examples and expand on their point. That's the last post I make in this thread because I don't want to not prompt discussion and all that :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by nvrspk4
No, because every post agreeing with the OP is open to challenging, as you yourself did. You asserted that your post should be left alone and not challenged. THAT is why your post would be considered pointless. Nobody told you that you shouldn't say you disagree and just leave them to be positive.Quote:
Originally Posted by adammm
People who post "I agree" can be challenged, just that they weren't.
Thanks for the appreciation guys :D. I've been away but I am back in action now!
I've tried telling mods many things on many occasions but no changes were made.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammeth.
If something isn't changed there is normally a good reason for it :). Any suggestions are carefully considered before we write them off!Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBuddy