Originally Posted by
Trinity
I don't have a total disregard for intellectual property law at all, if I did then I would illegally download stuff, but I don't. I apologise if the way I worded it didn't get my point across properly.
I don't agree with illegally downloading anything, I completely agree with what you said about people sacrificing the things they don't need, or just choosing a less glossy, free alternative. What I was trying to say was that I don't agree with pirating being likened to stealing something physical from a shop.
I like your newspaper analogy, I've never seen it put that way before.
The 'loss of potential' part interests me. I'm not sure how it's seen by law, but would an illegal downloader (who would never pay for it anyway) really count as a potential sale?
There was something else I wanted to say but I can't remember what it was.