Originally Posted by
Fez
Eli Roth, Zachary Quinto and now Kubrick? Adam you're on a roll :P
It's an interpretation and not an adaptation, something which Snyder's Watchmen absolutely fails at. It's so faithful in style and some of its substance that the liberties it takes don't fit in with the puzzle. It even twists bits to suit its political commentary on the *sigh* Bush administration and flips many of the action scenes to high set-pieces rather than tense slow plods of character just to suit the 'average movie viewer'. Kubrick's Shining decides to just make a film based on the material rather than try and slap the material on screen and it succeeds. In many ways I prefer it to the book but I also prefer the book's interpretation too, the two rather complete each other.