Why do you find me describing jerking off as a dirty habit 'offensive'? I am genuinely puzzled.
As for second hand smoking, please see the video for the one thousandeth time.
Printable View
Which I choose to consume, people don't force that upon me,unlike smoking, so I fail to see the comparison?
I'm not going to listen to a biast propaganda video which you've linked me, I'm going to listen to all the health experts who disagree with it and also common sense.Quote:
No it does not,please see the video and pay attention.
Suck it up; it isn't doing anything physical to you. Watching two men kiss each other won't give you lung cancer (I wouldn't be surprised if you tried to insinuate it did )Quote:
But watching a gaypride may have a mental negative effect on me even a physical effect by makingme feel sick watching (as I said before, I find it pornographic anddistatseful), so what about me? but essentially you've stated above that yourprime concern with smoking is the health of others.
No because again, you drinking vodka next to me will not physically affect me, I would have to choose to drink alcohol as well to be affected which is down to my own free will, whereas when people smoke, free will is ignored as it removes choice regarding whether or not they are effected by the smoke, unless they walk out of the building, which is much more inconvenient considering there are more non-smokers than smokers and it's much more convenient for everyone if the smoker goes outside to a designated smoking zone.Quote:
So right now i'd like you to come out in favour of banningall consumption of alcohol in public places, all consumption of salts, allconsumption of fatty foods and so forth. Hey, why not go the whole hog and banit completely seeing as you know best?
It's fairly comical that people don't actually watch it before arguing (Still, not as bad as general management not bothering to read threads before making a comment which has already been countered..), but I seriously doubt the legitimacy of their claims and it seems they handpicked testimonies to prove their argument. There is also a lot of evidence for second hand smoking as being a cause and a trigger for asthma not just for being carcinogenic second hand.
Smoking is a filthy habit and one biased video does not disprove years of scientific research. Personally I feel smoking should be banned completely
Because it isn't a dirty habit.
I don’t understand why you would bring even being gay up in an argument about SHS, but it must be because everyone can see your argument is false and you’re just clutching at straws.
Also, I suggest you read The Don's post very carefully because he's saying everything I'm thinking. :)
You aren't forced to consume smoke.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
You move away if somebody is smoking on certain premises. :rolleyes:
The video has the experts on it and show that the study which governments picked up on was discredited as complete and utter rubbish. But then don't let facts get in the way of an argument that you've been spoonfed by the media, the schools and by the general myth.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
And passive smoking won't give you lung cancer either.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
A free society isn't supposed to be convenient as a free society isn't ordered to the tastes of one individual.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
The scientific research on the subject is bogus, anywho do you agree with banning fatty foods and alcohol? yes/noQuote:
Originally Posted by Technologic
Because homosexuality is the perfect example of something that isn't viewed as negative by the younger generations (HxF) but is by the older generations, so i'm testing how this generation feels (along with homosexuals themselves on this forum) feel when I suggest that aspects of homosexuality ought to be banned based on how people feel about them rather than the rights of a free society coming first.Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessG
I don't even like smoking just as I don't like gay prides, but i'll defend both of them because its wrong to tell others how to live their lives.
Let's say even if it was harmful by second hand smoking (which its not), thats still not a reason to ban it because there are risks all around us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chippiewall
I've already mentioned, it's much more convenient for a smoker to go outside
Pretty much what technologic said...Quote:
The video has theexperts on it and show that the study which governments picked up on wasdiscredited as complete and utter rubbish. But then don't let facts get in theway of an argument that you've been spoonfed by the media, the schools and bythe general myth.
Read above ^Quote:
And passive smokingwon't give you lung cancer either.
Did you not read my response to that stupid comparison the first time around?Quote:
The scientificresearch on the subject is bogus, anywho do you agree with banning fatty foodsand alcohol? yes/no
Do you touch yourself at night? yes/no
Anyways, second hand smoke makes my clothes stink and that's more than enough reason to ban it.
Of which the WHO is accepted as the main platform of the science, just as the debunked IPCC is with global warming. All myths eventually fall apart just as global warming just has over the past year, this myth however concerning second hand smoke is still at its height.
But in time it will fall as they all do.
Then thats up to the pub owner who will decide based on what is good for his business which he owns.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
You brought up health, you truly do not care about health (as the video states, the anti-smoking lobby will often bang on about health in the patronising manner to pretend its good vs evil) as you aren't willing to protect people from themselves in terms of alcohol consumption etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
Next time, don't pretend that you care.
Could you answer the question.