AGM stands for Assistant General ManagerQuote:
Originally Posted by Rozi
Bertie isn't for sale!Quote:
Originally Posted by auffant1
Printable View
AGM stands for Assistant General ManagerQuote:
Originally Posted by Rozi
Bertie isn't for sale!Quote:
Originally Posted by auffant1
Why is your picture a panda plz.
Because they are cute animals and eat bamboo. There is another reason but those will do for now :PQuote:
Originally Posted by mdport.
How does anyone actually know this Bertie fellow? He just seems to of waltzed in and taken over, he could do anything :naughty:
Good question. He just appeared one day at the Habbox Offices and now we can't get rid of the guy! Here is some quotes from our members/staff about him:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack!
Quote:
"I think too much power has been delegated to Bertie. I mean we barely know the guy and he has almost complete control!" ~ Mr Elliot
Quote:
"That bertie guy's a bloody nightmare!" ~ David
Quote:
"I am going to find Bertie and hold him hostage. Then I am going to melt him with a very hot object." ~ Bolt660
I'm hijacking the thread to say yes we can manage without a content agm.
Reported.Quote:
Originally Posted by Inseriousity.
Quote:
A13. Do not hijack other users threads ~ It is not allowed to hijack other users threads. Especially ones they have created where they answer the user's questions.
I only brought that up because I know how much work Matt does and I don't think it's fair to put that much pressure on one person, with only one other person helping him (technically it's two but Matt's admitted it's only one).
If matt thinks its too much work, there's a staff agm that could easily do (and actually wants to, despite public perspective) more of an active role rather than the behind the scenes work that he currently does. I don't think there's a need to hire another person. The way departments are run now - agms acting as observers and helpful guides when mgmt require some assistance rather than bureaucratic middle management dictatorships - I'd find it silly to add more.
That's not what I'm (and a lot of other people are) led to believe. I don't think that the management team as a whole are doing the best job at the moment (no offense) - whether people agree or not is up to them - and I was wondering if it was because of that.