Which Computer Is Better?

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-01-2013, 05:58 PM
Teabags

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragga

The computers are the same price

the second one is better, but it's $100 more?
11-01-2013, 06:28 PM
Stephen!

First for gaming, second for everything else
12-01-2013, 01:22 AM
lawrawrrr

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrwoooooooo

no they're not. you're wrong.

they're not what? limited to updgrade-ability? Yes they are.
12-01-2013, 01:27 AM
Chippiewill

Looking for upgradability in a laptop for something other than RAM or hard drives is a very silly idea
12-01-2013, 10:05 AM
mrwoooooooo

Quote:

Originally Posted by laura

they're not what? limited to updgrade-ability? Yes they are.

what laptop do you have?
12-01-2013, 02:28 PM
lawrawrrr

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chippiewill

Looking for upgradability in a laptop for something other than RAM or hard drives is a very silly idea

Most of the time it's limited graphics capability people want to upgrade in a laptop, because you can't custom build them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrwoooooooo

what laptop do you have?

HP Pavilion dv6 currently. My old intel one was a Dell something or other and was just terrible.
12-01-2013, 02:33 PM
Chippiewill

Quote:

Originally Posted by laura

Most of the time it's limited graphics capability people want to upgrade in a laptop, because you can't custom build them.

Any upgradable notebook would be a rip off since they'd end up spending development money on adding that capability to the motherboard and any graphics card you can put in will be way overpriced anyway.

Also Intel / AMD isn't going to make any determination on graphics upgradability, that's firmly in the realms of the notebook's manufacturer.
12-01-2013, 03:06 PM
lawrawrrr

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chippiewill

Any upgradable notebook would be a rip off since they'd end up spending development money on adding that capability to the motherboard and any graphics card you can put in will be way overpriced anyway.

Also Intel / AMD isn't going to make any determination on graphics upgradability, that's firmly in the realms of the notebook's manufacturer.

Well it's not because low-end Intel drives and low-end AMD drives are completely different, and for the most part (as far as I'm aware, anyway), the Intel drives have rubbish, built-in graphics cards and no slots for a dedicated one, whereas the low end AMD drives usually have better drives or available slots.
12-01-2013, 03:54 PM
Chippiewill

Intel integrated graphics are not terrible for the low end.
12-01-2013, 05:40 PM
mrwoooooooo

Quote:

Originally Posted by laura

HP Pavilion dv6 currently. My old intel one was a Dell something or other and was just terrible.

not like i needed to know this to tell you, but you can't upgrade the graphics on it.

and most people who buy laptops dont buy them for their graphics power

Quote:

the Intel drives have rubbish, built-in graphics cards and no slots for a dedicated one, whereas the low end AMD drives usually have better drives or available slots.

intel dont usually make the motherboards, but you can also get laptops with an intel cpu and an nvidia gpu.

seriously please stop pretending you know about this -.-

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page