Aborted babies incinerated to heat UK hospitals

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skandair

Have you ever watched Torchwood?

http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g...tegories10.jpg

they tried something like that but it didnt go down well

---

Damn I thought my idea was original
;)

Nah never watched It haha

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Don

Shhhh let's not use common sense here

People that oppose abortion always amuse me because they generally seem to care about the potential life right up until the moment it's born and then it's on its own since those same people generally oppose welfare and child benefits.

---

Wow yes! Because the right to life is exactly the same as the supposed right to other people's money......... not.

Non sequitur.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

Wow yes! Because the right to life is exactly the same as the supposed right to other people's money......... not.

Non sequitur.

---

So who pays for the child to live that life if the parent doesn't want it/can't afford to raise it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Don

So who pays for the child to live that life if the parent doesn't want it/can't afford to raise it?

---

Nobody or virtually nobody is against basic welfare, but you can be for basic welfare, or even better, charity (voluntary welfarism which is what we should aim for) without supporting a huge expensive state with child benefits. The idea that supporting the right to life (one of the few real rights we actually do have) is comparable to supporting or not supporting child benefit is laughable. You have a right to your life, you do not have a right to the fruits of other people's labour or hard work.

As a libertarian for example, one of the few remits I believe the state has is protecting innocent life. That's a legit area for state involvement.

Your quote here sums up the hypocritical attitude, caring before the child's born but as soon as your money is involved it's "WHY SHOULD WE PAY TO CARE FOR THOSE MORONS OFFSPRING?!".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

Why should hard working taxpayers, many of whom have children themselves and who struggle to pay day-to-day bills, be forced to pay for the care of moronic and stupid teenage girls & their offspring who couldn't keep their legs shut?

What happens when you reward stupid and reckless behaviour? you get more of it.

---

We already have thousands of children in care waiting for adoption, if abortion was removed that would increase drastically. It's nice to think that we live in an ideal world where charity would be able to care for all these hundreds of thousands of extra unwanted children but that's far from reality.

Although I don't know what else could be done with the unwanted babies, I think the mothers should definitely be consulted before the hospitals turn to this procedure but most of you probably know I'm against abortion anyway. Nevertheless, this disgusts me.

*+*THeY'Re NoT BaBiieS*+*

Good old anti-choice writers pretending that clusters of undeveloped and unsustainable cells are babies. If everything is its potential rather than its actuality then all of us are mass-murderers each time we exfoliate, and blowing ones nose is genocide of the highest order

To be honest i agree with cerys why waste space burying dead foetuses?

Sent from my GT-I9100P using Tapatalk

This is quite upsetting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Don

But in all seriousness what do you want hospitals to do with all those foetuses?

---

Indeed, they can't ask the mother because obviously she wouldn't care what happens to the foetuses hence the abortion. The hospital can't just bury hundreds of foetuses. It's blaming the hospital for the poor decisions of the patients.