I understand what you are saying but using your old account is totally different to a new one.
Printable View
So what does that mean for all the majority of the members that have never been banned and and have kept an account for years when they see others just getting their accounts back after perm bans? Preferential treatment for those who have been?. The rules are there for a reason and Habbox doesn't just ban members and any old ones that were banned by a previous member of management with no reason given have been looked at already. You have to go some on here to get a perm ban under the pm/warning/infraction system. If a person can't hack being permed banned then they shouldn't break the rules. Most proper E-rebels know it goes with the territory and accept it as such.
I agree with Richie (wow, did I just say that? :P). It doesn't always have to be change, change, change. Improve what you've got before you change things.
There are so few Saurav - I really cannot see it making a difference except that the person concerned gets their account back and as most of the members who are already here on different accounts. People who have been on here and not banned should be recognised more if anything. The Anniversary VIP is okay for 5 years but maybe they should have something more if their account has never been banned at certain times e.g. 1. 2. 3 4, years. The only other accounts that are perm banned are spam bots, hackers, keyloggers etc who would not be welcome anyway.
Well yes but surely they can be dealt with on their individual merits by members coming back on other acccounts and proving beyond any doubt that they should be given a second chance and get their old account back. A mass unban would not be fair as I said to those who do abide by the rules. Just my opinion though.
scrap that pointless posting rule and only count it as things like "dsjfldjsfodsjflsdfjsdlfjlsd;frlkds;f,sdlfmds"
and add something like
"please add more content to your post" for posts like "lmaooooooo or lol"
i dont post in most threads because chances are it might be off topic
I do have to agree with you here and it is something that management know I disagree on. Pointless is random - nothing else in my book such a ROFLKOPTER or VCHDSS. The old rule made a lot more sense in my opinion. A thread was allowed to go slightly off-topic but if it really started veering off in another direction with nothing to do with the thread then a mod would post to say 'please keep on-topic.' These posts are not pointless as they mean something and are usually related to the topic in some way. I would say this is a big factor putting members off posting.
This is what annoys me. You guys always say "WATCH DIS SPACE" and then 5 months on nothing happens.
hey hye guess what forum.. watch this space! THERE WILL BE ANOTHER POST SOON! (its not a dig at you oli, just general management ;))
As long as their are more events that international people can participate in, and it isn't JUST oriented around the UK. If we want to go international, we shouldn't just have the election crap when the UK are having an election, do it for the other countries too... Also, with competitions like the election new members stand next to no chance with winning. The older members will all bunch together and form a "super group" which most of the older folks will vote for, which leaves the newbies losing, thus them potentially leaving... Maybe if you set it so you have to have half the team as new members and half as old ones it'll incorporate everyone together?
Sorry, i used the election as an example, its just the most recent event.
I wasn't overly enthusiastic about the election because I'm from Canada--I obviously don't care about British politics :p However I thought the HxF election was pretty cool, it was around the same time as the UK election yeah, but I don't think they were debating Europe related issues!
Luring in without intimidating new young users has been something that's been discussed for awhile, I'm not sure there's a quick remedy for it.
Awesomeeeeeeee maffew. Anyway, what m^ or whatever said is a good point. You seem to be banking on a lot of people signing up on the merge which is very likely seeing as this is still the biggest UK forum, if not the most active. For this to happen and for them to stay you need to entice them with US/CA/AU/SG events, even if it's just forum competitions asking questions about their country. What is the biggest region in Canada? What is the currency in Australia? - examples. That way, British people can google and the international users will feel like something is being done for them. Just an idea.
I also agree whole heartedly with Graham and Rosie I think it was with the off-topic posting rule.
There are many things that are being worked on and I am sorry if in the past you have experienced that these changes don't come about. I can assure you though if we mention something is being implemented regarding something it will happen :).
I quite agree we need to try and incorporate new members and it's an issue that's been mentioned before. It's quite difficult to make older members include new members though. There are so many older members that are stuck in their way, as it were.
We will definitely make a considerable effort, come the merge, to ensure that users from international communities are catered for as well :). I came up with an idea that we create public joinable usergroups (like the IT Crowd and Pixel Artists Group) that is relevant to each Hotel / International community. Then you get a little userbar with a country flag on it or something. I know one argument against this would be that it encourages factions but I think it's a nice little thing to do so people can show their heritage. What do you guys think?
I will have Oli look into this.
Pointless Posting Ruleee.
Which bits don't you like and I'll look into ensuring it's lightened up on.Quote:
A6. Do not post pointlessly ~ A pointless post has no relevance to the topic, any previous post that is relevant, is meaningless (ghnrgher etc) or does little to contribute to the discussion. A pointless thread either has no meaning, is something posted that is not true (e.g. false story in news and rumours) or a thread that doesn't prompt a discussion. Replying to a pointless post will also be considered pointlessly posting.
It must be noted though that a while back when we became quite strict on this, there was a lot of spam being scattered around the forums but perhaps it is time for more lenience here.
"little to contribute to the discussion" i think you should be able to reply to a post in there even if it's not about the original topic. thread: fave colour
person1: red
person2: thats the colour of my car!
or whatever, nothing about their fave colour and contributes little (nothing) to the discussion
fabby dabby doo! will those be in sunday changes then? (if they still happen)
fantastic, look forward to 'em.
Pointless posting and off-topic should be separated as they used to be because many members are upset that their comments are not pointlesss. The rule does not follow any dictionary definiton - it just makes the statement that anything that does not contribute positively to the post is 'pointless' when it is more likely to be off-topic.
Original rule
So this is a suggestion for alteration:Quote:
A6. Do not post pointlessly ~ A pointless post has no relevance to the topic, any previous post that is relevant, is meaningless (ghnrgher etc) or does little to contribute to the discussion. A pointless thread either has no meaning, is something posted that is not true (e.g. false story in news and rumours) or a thread that doesn't prompt a discussion. Replying to a pointless post will also be considered pointlessly posting.
or something along those lines. It can still be one rule but I believe it would be clearer to the members what they can and can't do.Quote:
A6
. Do not post off-topic ~ An off-topic post has no relevance to the topic, any previous post that is relevant, or does little to positively contribute to the discussion.
. Do not spam/make pointless posts. It is not allowed to post random, meaningless, posts or threads on the forum. Examples of this are (ROFLCOPTER!!!!!!); (BYRDSB +HKK; ) (I am a plane)
I think we really need to be careful about how we reform the rule. A lot of members have mentioned that they use HxF because our threads provide substance and isn't that spammy. If we don't do it properly we could totally destroy this reputation that I think is a good one to have.
Remember though a forum is a place to discuss things and all discussions lead to other discussions. It's how discussion works!