Do you Think Sadam should of been Hung?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Papershop

he had a right to die, if his followers decide to kill more people, it is there choice, not ours. We cannot control peoples actions, if they decide to kill someone, that is there wrong doing

---

Then why go into Iraq in the first place?
It's none of you/us lots business.

Where is the proof of these wars? There were none planned, Iraq was quiet. The only fear was Iran and Iraq creating a war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DiscoPat

Then why go into Iraq in the first place?
It's none of you/us lots business.

---

If you read my last post, you wouldnt be asking yourself this question

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GommeInc

Where is the proof of these wars? There were none planned, Iraq was quiet. The only fear was Iran and Iraq creating a war.

---

Err, youve just contradicted yourself mate.

There was no war planned between Iraq and Iran, but there was a fear there maybe one. Not contradicting. No wars planned but a fear was there maybe one being planned. I wrote it quickly that post as I was needed downstairs.

There was no real reason to go into Iraq.

There are very few people in the World who deserve the death penalty, Hitler and Osama Bin Laden being 2 of them. Saddam imo, was actually a good leader of Iraq, sure he killed some people, but Iraq was in peace. Of course they had their tensions with neighboring countries, and Israel. But then the US and UK came and claimed he had weapons of mass destruction, which obviously in the end he didn't. I think for killing the people, and all the other crimes against humanity he has committed, he should just be sent to jail, it'd be very hard for him to escape, unless he can get communications from his loyal followers. Hanging him was technically an 'act against humanity' so Bush and co. are at fault there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -Wolverine

There are very few people in the World who deserve the death penalty, Hitler and Osama Bin Laden being 2 of them. Saddam imo, was actually a good leader of Iraq, sure he killed some people, but Iraq was in peace. Of course they had their tensions with neighboring countries, and Israel. But then the US and UK came and claimed he had weapons of mass destruction, which obviously in the end he didn't. I think for killing the people, and all the other crimes against humanity he has committed, he should just be sent to jail, it'd be very hard for him to escape, unless he can get communications from his loyal followers. Hanging him was technically an 'act against humanity' so Bush and co. are at fault there.

---

Quoted for truth :) Everything was true there.

I suppose hanging, especially at this time of Iraq's 'condition' wasn't the best decision to make... He shld be in a horrible pitch black cell on suiside watch at least until Iraq is better, but I suppose you cant argue.

He ordered the death of 145+ people.. He had it coming really.
I have no beef with him apart from that; it really wasnt fair.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -Wolverine

There are very few people in the World who deserve the death penalty, Hitler and Osama Bin Laden being 2 of them. Saddam imo, was actually a good leader of Iraq, sure he killed some people, but Iraq was in peace. Of course they had their tensions with neighboring countries, and Israel. But then the US and UK came and claimed he had weapons of mass destruction, which obviously in the end he didn't. I think for killing the people, and all the other crimes against humanity he has committed, he should just be sent to jail, it'd be very hard for him to escape, unless he can get communications from his loyal followers. Hanging him was technically an 'act against humanity' so Bush and co. are at fault there.

---

Cant disagree one bit.:rolleyes: +rep.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -Wolverine

There are very few people in the World who deserve the death penalty, Hitler and Osama Bin Laden being 2 of them. Saddam imo, was actually a good leader of Iraq, sure he killed some people, but Iraq was in peace. Of course they had their tensions with neighboring countries, and Israel. But then the US and UK came and claimed he had weapons of mass destruction, which obviously in the end he didn't. I think for killing the people, and all the other crimes against humanity he has committed, he should just be sent to jail, it'd be very hard for him to escape, unless he can get communications from his loyal followers. Hanging him was technically an 'act against humanity' so Bush and co. are at fault there.

---

yeh i agree
i was banned for saying a good thing about saddam loL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -Wolverine

There are very few people in the World who deserve the death penalty, Hitler and Osama Bin Laden being 2 of them. Saddam imo, was actually a good leader of Iraq, sure he killed some people, but Iraq was in peace. Of course they had their tensions with neighboring countries, and Israel. But then the US and UK came and claimed he had weapons of mass destruction, which obviously in the end he didn't. I think for killing the people, and all the other crimes against humanity he has committed, he should just be sent to jail, it'd be very hard for him to escape, unless he can get communications from his loyal followers. Hanging him was technically an 'act against humanity' so Bush and co. are at fault there.

---

Completely wrong. it was not down to Bush and blair to decide upon sadams fate, for it was the judges and the panels decision to hang. Just because someone was a good leader, it cannot contemplate for what he done previously.