Naming Scammers Campaign

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hoody

Here you go jamie
[img]http://www.****************/uploads/c08b777820*************

For those who agree with jamie, there is a pic for sig

---

mines better :(

Lol look now :p fixed it - Even tho yours is still tonnes better :P

Im off =) Bye

Teehee :) I remember before infractions i used to post in everyones threads saying Scams :) but only messing and i would never get told off but then one day i did it to the wrong guy and got permed :'(

Lol scars sig way better, not gona put in cause i got no room

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hoody

Review - If a majority of the runescape forum believe it to be a good idea though, surely there could be a trial just in this section, and depending how it turns out, go on from there?

Also review, peoples opinions are changing atm, so just saying about the old threads made doesnt help. 'Progress only happens if people let it ':P =)

---

I'll sum it up for you, and sorry if I sound condescending - I don't meant to be.

You are MrRunescapeUser. You visit HabboxForum. I decide, because I'm now allowed to name scammers, I'll post a big thread saying 'DO NOT TRADE WITH MRRUNESCAPEUSER!!!!" then edit a few screenshots to show you stealing my stuff. No one trades with you again.

It's FAR too easy for someone to get victimized and bullied and have their reputation ruined by lies - and at HabboxForum our concern is that we want everyone to be treated fairly. Naming of 'scammers' would just open up a can of worms.

I moderate the Graphics Forums, and it's already very, very difficult to find proof of someone ripping, and for that there is physical proof. No matter how foolproof a system we put up, some people would always be blamed unfairly.

We would rather let 10 people get scammed by someone because you couldn't post their name, than let one person have a crap time because someone faked they were a scammer.

End of story.

Which is why we should all resort to PMs.

Yeah scammers should be named so that no one else gets scammed

but u should only point out a scammer
with proof...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Purpleesh

Yeah scammers should be named so that no one else gets scammed

but u should only point out a scammer
with proof...

---

What is proof? Mr Joe Nobody saying "Purpleesh scammed me"? What about an edited screenshot? Is that proof? An edited video?

People can make proof to suit their own needs ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deagle

Which is why we should all resort to PMs.

---

Be that as it may, at least not everyone finds out if someone lies.

We were allowed to name scammers back when we had a safe and unsafe list. It caused so many arguements, all threads were being flammed and it was hell.

If you want to aware someone of a scammer, send them a PM, that way, noone will find out that you've accused someone of scamming and so on.

Sorry for double post, I lagged :'(.