How do you know it's not his real opinion, and it's your opinion that the ps3 has good games, but it's his opinion that it doesn't... :rolleyes:
Printable View
alex 1889, there is no point you being in this thread... You say true statemtns are false and never come back with any comments. We might aswell argue with a brick wall with you "/
Nintendo have always aimed at gameplay, which is why they evolved in ways to play a game, not how a game should look like. The brought out the controllers with side buttons and analog sticks "/ Then created the Wii-mote on their latest console, the Wii. Sony have evolved graphically, rather than through gameplay.
Their ideas came after Nintendo. When the N64 came out, Sony slowly followed the analog stick and placed it on their consoles a few months later than Nintendo. Side buttons appeared on the PS 1 when they went into the gaming business.
I know, through my experience and what sort of games I like, that Sony create games for their consoles that are boring, repetitive and unimaginative. I go with the idea that Sony only make racing and shooting up games. No adventure or fantasy games. Other than fighting games which have fantasy characters, but the fighting part of the game is the main point.
All these glorified features in a PS3 mean nothing to me. I want a fun games console, not a games console which has evolved into a Multi-Media Device "/
PS3 is better IMO.
Choose your words carefully sir. I wasn't completely stating my opinions on the PS3, I was stating OTHER people's thought, reread my topic, I didn't use my opinion as munch, I like SONY and I hate to say this but the PS3 is overpriced, and you to call me a fanboy? :l I own many consoles from many companies and you have the right to call me a fanboy when you are rooting for the PlayStation 3? Lemme rephrase that...ONLY the PlayStation 3, have you even bothered to look at your post, I wouldn't just called you an idiot because of your opinion, mind your own buisness perhaps, its your choice, as I said 'Choose your words carefully', also I never said the games were bad. So you are only thinking up random thoughts to make me look bad. Also, whats wrong with 10 year olds, they are children, I have a 12 year old brother, but he likes all the consoles, age doesn't matter, its how you think that makes the real person you are.
ps3 because its the only one ive played
Ok none of them are as good as each other, it all depends on what the user likes. The Wii is by far the most interactive console, so if people like these sort of games then the Wii would be best.
PS3 is the most high-tech as its really more of a super computer than a games console. But its downfall is the price, the blu-ray is also useless with out a HD Tv, but if you have lots of money and can afford it with HD Tv then it is the best.
Xbox 360 has some very nice features and some excellent games. Although it doesn't have as much power as a PS3 tis is probably the best for money. It isnt very expensive compared to the PS3 but isnt as interactive as the Wii. Its main feature is Xbox Live which is a very good bonus. People who like the Halo series and other top games that only come out on Xbox 360 will perfer this.
But to see who will win will be intresting to see. Maybe when the PS3 comes down in price more people will buy it or will the Xbox 360 keep its great sales up? Some chance of Wii winning if an interactive craze starts or if they get some good inter active games.